H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nicolas Escude vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 1-0
Nicolas Escude holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Escude leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Escude won the 1999 Toulouse final 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 1999* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Nicolas Escude | 7-5 6-1 | Daniel Vacek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Escude | #1,071 | #17 | 1,357 | 1,909 | 157 | 124 | 55.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Escude | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #670 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,820 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #34 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #114 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #64 | 1,829 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |