H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Nicolas Jarry vs Filip Krajinovic H2H: 1-0
Nicolas Jarry holds a 1–0 lead over Filip Krajinovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Jarry leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicolas Jarry won the 2018 Wimbledon first round 6-3 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Chile
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2018* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Nicolas Jarry | 6-3 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | Filip Krajinovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Jarry | #211 | #16 | 2,295 | 1,942 | 110 | 117 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Filip Krajinovic | #1,204 | #26 | 1,724 | 1,984 | 115 | 125 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Jarry | Filip Krajinovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #372 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #420 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #111 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #43 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #77 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #101 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #234 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #34 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #152 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #94 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #19 | 1,907 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #40 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,870 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #122 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #42 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,603 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #311 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |