H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nicolas Lapentti vs Frederic Fontang H2H: 0-1
Frederic Fontang holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Frederic Fontang leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Frederic Fontang won the 1996 Mexico City third round 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1996* | Mexico City | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Frederic Fontang | 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 6-2 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Frederic Fontang | #977 | #59 | 576 | 1,641 | 28 | 60 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Lapentti | Frederic Fontang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #371 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #59 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 9–27 | 25.0% | #156 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #202 | 1,468 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #259 | 1,458 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,441 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,434 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,471 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |