H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Nicolas Lapentti vs Javier Sanchez H2H: 1-0
Nicolas Lapentti holds a 1–0 lead over Javier Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Lapentti leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 1998 Scottsdale third round 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 1998* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nicolas Lapentti | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Javier Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Javier Sanchez | #957 | #23 | 1,256 | 1,847 | 321 | 328 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Lapentti | Javier Sanchez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #225 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #55 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #51 | 1,759 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #32 | 1,733 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #41 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 39–31 | 55.7% | #34 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 25–33 | 43.1% | #42 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #36 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 30–33 | 47.6% | #37 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 35–33 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 8–26 | 23.5% | #168 | 1,506 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,492 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #957 | 1,481 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |