H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Nicolas Lapentti vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 2-1

Nicolas Lapentti holds a 2–1 lead over Jurgen Melzer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2010 Barcelona second round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Lapentti
ECU Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 21, 2010* Barcelona ATP 500 R64 Clay Jurgen Melzer #27 6-3 6-3 Nicolas Lapentti #118 Match data
Apr 28, 2004* Barcelona ATP 250 R64 Clay Nicolas Lapentti #68 7-5 6-1 Jurgen Melzer #67 Match data
May 25, 2002* St. Poelten ATP 250 QF Clay Nicolas Lapentti #31 6-2 4-6 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #138 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,935 282 280 50.2% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 1996 11–19 36.7% #121 1,576 0 1 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,660 0 1 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,596 0 1 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,755 0 3 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,837 0 4 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,714 0 5 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,697 0 5 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2004 7–14 33.3% #122 1,600 0 5 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,579 0 5 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,682 0 5 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,611 0 5 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2008 14–17 45.2% #86 1,658 0 5 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,668 0 5 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,582 0 5 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5