H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Nicolas Lapentti vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0
Nicolas Lapentti holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Lapentti leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2006 Estoril third round 6-7(3) 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2006* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Nicolas Lapentti | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-4 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nicolas Lapentti | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |