H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Lapentti vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 0-1

Pablo Cuevas holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Lapentti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pablo Cuevas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pablo Cuevas won the 2009 Chile Open first round 6-3 3-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Lapentti
ECU Age 50 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Pablo Cuevas
URU Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Lapentti #74 2-6 6-3 6-0 Pablo Cuevas #121 Match data Apr 20, 2009 Q1 Q Barcelona Open ATP 500 Clay
Pablo Cuevas #171 6-3 3-6 7-5 Nicolas Lapentti #83 Match data Feb 5, 2009* R32 Chile Open ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,933 282 283 49.9% 0 0 0 2 3 5
Pablo Cuevas #841 #19 1,865 1,960 212 213 49.9% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Pablo Cuevas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1996 11–20 35.5% #121 1,568 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,658 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,595 0 1 2007 0–1 0.0% #113 1,551 0 0
22 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3 2008 8–13 38.1% #142 1,633 0 0
23 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,750 0 3 2009 18–15 54.5% #50 1,745 0 0
24 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,835 0 4 2010 20–22 47.6% #63 1,760 0 0
25 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,713 0 5 2011 11–13 45.8% #142 1,743 0 0
26 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,696 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 2004 7–15 31.8% #122 1,587 0 5 2013 2–4 33.3% #220 1,716 0 0
28 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,575 0 5 2014 17–12 58.6% #30 1,843 0 2
29 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,680 0 5 2015 28–25 52.8% #40 1,815 0 3
30 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,610 0 5 2016 34–23 59.6% #22 1,810 0 5
31 2008 14–18 43.8% #86 1,650 0 5 2017 20–21 48.8% #32 1,787 0 6
32 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,667 0 5 2018 13–14 48.1% #88 1,766 0 6
33 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,581 0 5 2019 22–23 48.9% #45 1,741 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #67 1,691 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 2021 9–11 45.0% #97 1,651 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2022 3–6 33.3% #269 1,654 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Pablo Cuevas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1995 — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1 8 9 11.1% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 3 6 9 33.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 4 11 15 26.7% 12 16 28 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 22 12 34 64.7% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — — — — —
23 2000 23 15 38 60.5% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2010 8 9 17 47.1% 12 13 25 48.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2002 10 12 22 45.5% 16 12 28 57.1% 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — —
26 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 11 11 22 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 5 6 11 45.5% 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — — — — — 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2005 3 7 10 30.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2014 4 5 9 44.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 8 13 21 38.1% 19 9 28 67.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2007 3 5 8 37.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 9 13 22 40.9% 21 8 29 72.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
31 2008 4 6 10 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2017 6 11 17 35.3% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — —
32 2009 3 5 8 37.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 4 3 7 57.1% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 18 12 30 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 3 3 6 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 100 114 214 46.7% 154 136 290 53.1% 10 16 26 38.5% 18 17 35 51.4% — 56 86 142 39.4% 149 116 265 56.2% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 490/565 of Nicolas Lapentti's and 421/425 of Pablo Cuevas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Pablo Cuevas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1995 3/5 6.3 2.7 62.2% 77.3% 59.8% 64.6% 47.2% 70.1% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 25/31 3.8 3.4 56.2% 67.4% 47.9% 49.9% 41.1% 58.8% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 32/35 4.4 2.8 60.4% 71.2% 48.1% 56.0% 46.1% 61.9% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 40/45 3.4 3.8 63.2% 67.2% 44.6% 49.7% 42.8% 58.7% 38.4% 2007 1/1 1.0 5.0 43.6% 50.0% 40.9% 58.8% 14.3% 44.9% 34.6%
22 1999 59/76 5.3 2.4 61.7% 72.0% 50.2% 64.0% 40.2% 63.5% 40.7% 2008 21/21 4.1 1.9 59.3% 63.2% 54.4% 55.2% 37.5% 59.5% 35.1%
23 2000 53/68 6.3 3.4 57.6% 72.3% 49.1% 61.4% 43.9% 62.4% 38.6% 2009 33/33 7.5 2.2 63.6% 72.0% 51.8% 60.2% 47.4% 64.8% 34.6%
24 2001 38/52 5.7 3.2 56.1% 74.4% 47.9% 57.3% 41.7% 62.8% 38.8% 2010 41/42 4.7 2.2 61.6% 68.2% 47.5% 50.4% 40.6% 60.3% 37.2%
25 2002 49/59 6.6 2.6 59.0% 73.4% 49.0% 49.6% 35.4% 63.3% 38.5% 2011 24/24 5.4 1.7 59.8% 72.3% 56.0% 58.0% 41.2% 65.9% 37.8%
26 2003 41/42 4.9 2.2 61.5% 69.0% 50.1% 56.3% 40.4% 61.7% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 21/22 4.1 2.3 58.4% 68.7% 52.6% 56.8% 36.5% 62.0% 35.6% 2013 6/6 5.8 4.0 57.6% 69.0% 46.5% 67.5% 32.5% 59.5% 31.7%
28 2005 25/25 3.2 1.6 64.4% 68.8% 50.2% 52.2% 32.3% 62.2% 35.8% 2014 29/29 5.7 3.1 60.1% 72.0% 52.7% 47.6% 37.7% 64.2% 39.5%
29 2006 21/21 3.5 1.4 63.2% 68.6% 45.4% 60.5% 42.1% 60.2% 41.5% 2015 53/53 5.8 2.8 60.5% 71.4% 52.5% 64.8% 42.6% 63.7% 37.5%
30 2007 24/24 4.3 2.3 60.5% 68.8% 44.7% 57.7% 37.1% 59.0% 34.0% 2016 55/57 7.6 2.9 60.3% 75.8% 55.2% 62.3% 42.7% 67.5% 36.5%
31 2008 31/32 3.2 2.0 62.5% 68.6% 50.4% 50.4% 43.5% 61.9% 36.0% 2017 41/41 5.3 3.6 59.0% 72.6% 51.0% 59.7% 42.4% 63.7% 36.3%
32 2009 20/20 4.4 2.7 60.2% 66.9% 49.5% 55.4% 40.2% 60.0% 36.1% 2018 27/27 6.2 3.3 60.2% 74.3% 55.2% 57.1% 37.9% 66.4% 36.6%
33 2010 8/8 1.6 2.3 53.8% 62.6% 45.5% 40.0% 35.4% 54.9% 34.4% 2019 45/45 5.5 3.0 58.9% 74.2% 52.7% 54.8% 44.8% 65.5% 36.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 17/17 5.9 3.5 60.3% 70.5% 49.4% 60.5% 33.6% 62.2% 35.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/20 4.8 2.5 68.9% 70.3% 50.2% 58.6% 43.1% 63.8% 35.6%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 8/9 2.8 1.9 66.8% 67.4% 53.2% 60.2% 47.2% 63.3% 37.4%
Career — 490/565 4.7 2.7 60.2% 70.3% 48.7% 55.7% 40.4% 61.6% 38.0% — 421/425 5.8 2.8 60.8% 71.7% 52.3% 58.1% 41.6% 64.1% 36.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Lapentti Pablo Cuevas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1995 1595 115.3 +3.11 +1.13 1.285 52.9% — +53 — 83.3% +1.67 2–0 1–1 — +0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1569 122.4 -2.38 -0.82 0.920 48.4% -108 +97 +28 40.5% -0.77 7–8 (47%) 12–6 (67%) — +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1659 129.3 +0.24 +1.23 1.054 50.8% -156 +64 — 45.0% -0.14 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 1595 132.1 -1.83 +0.31 0.932 48.6% -86 +85 — 40.4% -0.57 5–9 (36%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.69 2007 1551 110.8 +3.13 +0.76 0.628 39.7% — — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.20
22 1999 1883 154.4 +1.96 +3.11 1.116 52.2% -43 -24 — 59.3% +0.58 22–7 (76%) 17–14 (55%) — -1.12 2008 1633 124.3 -1.73 -1.88 0.867 47.8% +1 -44 — 37.5% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.48
23 2000 1751 142.0 +0.96 +0.97 1.026 50.6% +22 +87 -251 53.7% +0.39 16–5 (76%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.98 2009 1745 137.5 +0.89 -2.33 0.983 50.1% -71 +96 — 55.4% +0.08 6–6 (50%) 7–2 (78%) — +1.03
24 2001 1836 155.3 +1.70 +1.34 1.041 50.6% -27 +112 — 55.1% +0.40 10–5 (67%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.27 2010 1761 136.7 -1.96 -0.08 0.937 48.6% -45 +38 — 48.9% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 15–2 (88%) — +0.76
25 2002 1713 133.6 +1.50 +0.61 1.049 50.5% +6 +68 -121 50.6% +0.13 18–9 (67%) 13–13 (50%) — +1.94 2011 1743 138.9 +2.31 +0.26 1.110 51.3% -28 +9 — 52.6% +0.12 2–7 (22%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.08
26 2003 1697 131.8 -0.81 -0.35 0.961 49.4% -25 +79 — 48.2% -0.17 5–8 (38%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 1588 121.8 -0.38 -0.79 0.938 48.5% +44 +67 — 38.0% -0.68 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.01 2013 1717 114.3 -1.40 -3.04 0.783 46.7% -23 — — 43.8% -1.13 1–1 1–1 — +0.05
28 2005 1575 129.8 -0.05 -0.90 0.948 48.9% -6 +95 — 37.5% -0.70 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.17 2014 1843 147.6 +0.35 +2.31 1.103 51.7% -117 +98 — 54.7% +0.27 7–6 (54%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.40
29 2006 1681 124.7 -1.29 +2.41 1.042 50.7% — +73 — 52.7% +0.05 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) — +0.31 2015 1815 156.3 +0.03 +1.37 1.032 50.7% -98 +211 -198 50.7% +0.06 9–11 (45%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.40
30 2007 1611 123.4 -2.74 -2.10 0.829 47.0% -49 +93 -16 38.3% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.08 2016 1810 152.1 +3.77 +0.09 1.125 51.7% -111 +203 -133 57.5% +0.44 12–10 (55%) 19–20 (49%) — +2.40
31 2008 1650 136.2 -0.69 -0.13 0.944 48.9% -103 +132 — 48.1% -0.15 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.36 2017 1788 154.1 +0.80 -0.10 0.998 49.9% -91 +130 — 47.6% -0.14 9–7 (56%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.79
32 2009 1667 132.7 -1.19 +0.26 0.902 48.2% -65 +134 — 40.7% -0.64 5–8 (38%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.19 2018 1767 142.3 +1.63 +0.47 1.090 51.2% -24 +67 — 47.0% +0.24 4–4 (50%) 6–14 (30%) — +0.81
33 2010 1581 117.8 -2.88 -0.42 0.762 44.8% +18 +71 — 26.3% -1.74 0–2 0–1 — -0.76 2019 1741 144.0 +1.27 -0.02 1.050 50.6% -34 +106 -89 49.1% +0.03 7–8 (47%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.69
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1692 131.9 -0.42 -0.37 0.941 48.8% -54 +121 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.62
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1652 127.3 +0.69 -1.10 0.984 49.6% -2 +108 — 45.1% -0.25 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.71
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1654 112.6 +0.30 -1.95 1.017 50.8% — +63 — 41.7% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.50
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1612 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1580 89.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1934 143.0 -0.03 +0.60 0.990 49.8% -30 +76 -105 48.7% -0.07 114–88 (56%) 108–103 (51%) 107.5 +0.25 — 1960 148.4 +0.77 -0.05 1.019 50.3% -70 +102 -143 49.9% -0.03 68–74 (48%) 100–95 (51%) 98.5 +1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.