H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Nicolas Lapentti vs Santiago Giraldo H2H: 1-0
Nicolas Lapentti holds a 1–0 lead over Santiago Giraldo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Lapentti leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2009 Indian Wells Masters first round 4-6 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ECU
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
COL
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2010 | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Santiago Giraldo | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | Nicolas Lapentti | Match data |
| Mar 14, 2009* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Nicolas Lapentti | 4-6 6-1 7-5 | Santiago Giraldo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Lapentti | #885 | #6 | 2,293 | 1,935 | 282 | 280 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Santiago Giraldo | #1,242 | #28 | 1,230 | 1,929 | 141 | 185 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Lapentti | Santiago Giraldo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 5–0 | 100.0% | #109 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #163 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 16–29 | 35.6% | #90 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #8 | 1,883 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #64 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #55 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #23 | 1,837 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #57 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #29 | 1,714 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #69 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #57 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #32 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #122 | 1,600 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #70 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #95 | 1,579 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #91 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #67 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #227 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #109 | 1,611 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #253 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #86 | 1,658 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2009 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |