H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Nicolas Mahut vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 1-2

Jurgen Melzer holds a 2–1 lead over Nicolas Mahut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Jurgen Melzer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2010 Roland Garros second round 6-1 3-6 7-6(7) 6-4.

FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 2
3 main draw meetings
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 27, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Jurgen Melzer #27 6-1 3-6 7-6(7) 6-4 Nicolas Mahut #154 Match data
Jun 28, 2006* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Nicolas Mahut #77 6-7(3) 7-5 6-1 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #78 Match data
Jul 9, 2004* Newport ATP 250 R16 Grass Jurgen Melzer #46 6-3 6-1 Nicolas Mahut #123 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,926 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Mahut Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,516 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,498 0 0 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,445 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,538 0 0 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,644 0 0 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,633 0 0 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,662 0 0 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,765 0 0 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,754 0 0 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,851 0 2 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,666 0 2 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,869 0 4 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,753 0 4 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,707 0 4 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5