H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Nicolas Mahut vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 1-2
Jurgen Melzer holds a 2–1 lead over Nicolas Mahut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Jurgen Melzer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2010 Roland Garros second round 6-1 3-6 7-6(7) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 45
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Jurgen Melzer | 6-1 3-6 7-6(7) 6-4 | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Nicolas Mahut | 6-7(3) 7-5 6-1 6-4 | Jurgen Melzer | Match data |
| Jul 9, 2004* | Newport | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Jurgen Melzer | 6-3 6-1 | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Mahut | #1,433 | #37 | 1,122 | 1,926 | 179 | 224 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jurgen Melzer | #1,552 | #8 | 3,055 | 2,024 | 326 | 303 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Mahut | Jurgen Melzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #491 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #358 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #94 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #79 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #39 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #52 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #41 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2008 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2009 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #34 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #132 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #28 | 1,924 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2011 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 49–25 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,998 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2012 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #108 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2013 | 17–7 | 70.8% | #50 | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #29 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #27 | 1,825 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2015 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #71 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #113 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2016 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #155 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #103 | 1,753 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #306 | 1,770 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #190 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #194 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #288 | 1,703 | 0 | 5 |