H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Nicolas Mahut vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 1-0

Nicolas Mahut holds a 1–0 lead over Lukas Lacko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Mahut leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicolas Mahut won the 2016 Libéma Open first round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Mahut
FRA Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Mahut #49 6-1 6-4 Lukas Lacko #119 Match data Jun 9, 2016* R32 Libéma Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nicolas Mahut #1,433 #37 1,122 1,930 179 224 44.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Mahut Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2000 0–2 0.0% #388 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 1–4 20.0% #216 1,500 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 2002 0–1 0.0% #269 1,446 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 2003 3–6 33.3% #94 1,539 0 0 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2004 3–10 23.1% #131 1,545 0 0 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2005 1–5 16.7% #134 1,467 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2006 11–19 36.7% #66 1,581 0 0 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2007 22–20 52.4% #45 1,732 0 0 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2008 16–26 38.1% #94 1,645 0 0 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2009 4–4 50.0% #214 1,634 0 0 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2010 3–7 30.0% #132 1,663 0 0 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2011 11–12 47.8% #80 1,776 0 0 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2012 16–18 47.1% #108 1,757 0 0 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2013 17–7 70.8% #50 1,852 0 2 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
32 2014 14–23 37.8% #117 1,664 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 2015 11–10 52.4% #71 1,767 0 3 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0
34 2016 23–20 53.5% #39 1,871 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2017 14–19 42.4% #103 1,754 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2018 5–8 38.5% #190 1,708 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2019 4–3 57.1% #194 1,707 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nicolas Mahut Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2004 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2007 11 13 24 45.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2008 13 16 29 44.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2011 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2012 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
31 2013 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 12 11 23 52.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 92 133 225 40.9% 17 39 56 30.4% 67 41 108 62.0% 3 11 14 21.4% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 401/403 of Nicolas Mahut's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nicolas Mahut Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2000 2/2 2.5 3.5 54.1% 65.6% 50.0% 54.2% 34.3% 58.4% 30.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 5/5 9.0 4.0 63.3% 71.4% 45.1% 59.0% 24.9% 61.6% 31.0% 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 2002 1/1 10.0 0.0 59.2% 69.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 65.3% 32.4% 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 2003 9/9 9.4 5.2 58.3% 71.9% 49.0% 55.7% 32.7% 62.4% 33.9% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2004 12/13 7.8 5.1 58.7% 68.5% 42.4% 46.6% 44.2% 57.7% 34.2% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2005 6/6 7.7 3.3 60.0% 77.5% 44.7% 36.9% 32.6% 64.2% 26.7% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2006 30/30 7.9 3.4 62.2% 70.5% 48.4% 56.4% 45.6% 62.2% 31.6% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2007 42/42 7.8 4.9 57.0% 75.5% 52.0% 61.9% 42.1% 65.2% 33.9% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2008 42/42 9.0 4.2 61.9% 72.6% 49.2% 63.1% 38.8% 63.7% 31.5% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2009 8/8 9.0 2.6 62.3% 80.1% 50.1% 63.2% 40.7% 68.9% 35.2% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2010 10/10 17.8 5.1 64.7% 76.0% 49.3% 66.9% 52.9% 66.5% 29.4% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2011 22/23 7.3 3.7 59.9% 74.6% 52.0% 61.9% 35.6% 65.3% 37.6% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2012 34/34 8.0 2.7 60.4% 72.3% 50.5% 64.5% 39.6% 63.8% 32.9% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2013 24/24 8.5 3.3 59.3% 79.5% 54.2% 71.3% 42.4% 69.1% 39.1% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
32 2014 37/37 7.7 3.4 60.8% 72.2% 49.9% 55.5% 38.3% 63.6% 33.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 21/21 7.4 2.9 62.7% 72.3% 46.6% 58.6% 40.6% 63.0% 36.2% 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
34 2016 43/43 5.3 2.6 60.7% 74.0% 50.5% 58.7% 53.5% 64.9% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 33/33 6.5 2.8 61.3% 70.8% 52.4% 60.0% 33.8% 63.7% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 13/13 4.3 3.4 61.0% 72.2% 48.5% 54.4% 39.0% 62.9% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 7/7 7.1 2.7 59.4% 72.5% 55.1% 71.2% 36.9% 65.8% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 401/403 7.7 3.5 60.6% 73.3% 50.1% 60.0% 41.0% 64.2% 33.9% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nicolas Mahut Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1518 106.3 -0.24 -1.50 0.740 45.8% — — — 16.7% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.11 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1500 110.5 -0.73 -2.42 0.806 46.0% +14 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.14 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 2002 1447 95.7 -1.89 -0.35 0.934 45.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.22 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2003 1540 115.6 +0.41 -1.30 0.903 48.1% +28 — — 23.8% -1.38 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.20 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2004 1545 109.2 -3.28 -1.51 0.808 46.2% +20 -80 +2 29.4% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.16 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.83
23 2005 1468 108.5 -0.35 -3.57 0.745 46.3% +26 — — 28.6% -1.00 0–2 0–2 — +0.50 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.54
24 2006 1582 128.9 +0.81 -3.33 0.835 47.0% -87 -146 +113 39.7% -0.46 3–1 (75%) 4–12 (25%) — -1.54 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
25 2007 1733 136.0 +2.07 -1.43 0.975 49.5% -133 -232 +160 51.4% +0.10 7–7 (50%) 10–13 (43%) — -1.38 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.64
26 2008 1646 139.7 +0.72 -3.30 0.869 48.1% +10 -169 +149 38.0% -0.56 10–6 (63%) 7–18 (28%) — -1.66 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
27 2009 1634 116.4 +1.22 +0.45 1.133 52.1% — — +194 52.6% +0.42 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.02 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.16
28 2010 1663 119.6 +0.80 -3.07 0.879 48.7% -81 — +172 41.4% -0.41 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.59 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2011 1776 139.1 +1.77 +0.87 1.085 51.4% 0 — -11 51.9% +0.54 2–2 (50%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.18 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2012 1758 146.6 +0.71 -2.00 0.908 48.7% -26 -191 +12 47.3% -0.12 4–3 (57%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.76 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.00
31 2013 1853 136.9 +4.19 +0.90 1.267 53.8% -98 — +138 67.3% +1.11 1–2 (33%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.94 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2014 1665 136.4 -0.71 -2.67 0.911 48.4% -1 -159 +232 40.9% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.82 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1767 136.4 -0.11 +0.13 0.976 49.7% -83 -165 +250 55.0% -0.22 2–5 (29%) 11–2 (85%) — +0.49 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 2016 1872 149.7 +1.33 -0.93 1.009 50.1% -84 -256 +228 52.4% +0.15 7–4 (64%) 9–11 (45%) — +1.44 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1754 138.7 +0.15 -2.13 0.929 49.1% +26 -152 +157 42.5% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 9–5 (64%) — +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1708 129.0 -0.69 -0.86 0.916 48.2% +41 — — 33.3% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 1707 120.2 +0.99 -0.41 1.000 50.7% — -37 +125 54.5% +0.55 2–1 (67%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 1668 101.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1629 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1930 140.6 +0.77 -1.60 0.946 49.2% -34 -161 +146 45.4% -0.20 54–57 (49%) 90–120 (43%) 97.9 -0.46 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.