H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nicolas Mahut vs Mischa Zverev H2H: 1-1
Nicolas Mahut and Mischa Zverev are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Mahut leads 1–0 on clay, while Mischa Zverev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mischa Zverev won the 2010 Metz fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2015 | Marseille | ATP 250 | Q2 | Hard | Nicolas Mahut | 7-6(5) 6-1 | Mischa Zverev | Match data |
| Sep 24, 2010* | Metz | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mischa Zverev | 6-4 6-2 | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
| May 26, 2010* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Nicolas Mahut | 6-1 6-2 6-4 | Mischa Zverev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Mahut | #1,433 | #37 | 1,122 | 1,926 | 179 | 224 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Mischa Zverev | #1,373 | #25 | 1,664 | 2,007 | 134 | 199 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Mahut | Mischa Zverev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #80 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #94 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–18 | 10.0% | #211 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #176 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #171 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #132 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #51 | 1,917 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #33 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #108 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2013 | 17–7 | 70.8% | #50 | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2015 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #71 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2016 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #103 | 1,753 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #190 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #194 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |