H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nicolas Mahut vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 1-2
Pablo Cuevas holds a 2–1 lead over Nicolas Mahut in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Pablo Cuevas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pablo Cuevas won the 2017 Madrid Masters third round 5-7 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2017* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Pablo Cuevas | 5-7 6-4 6-4 | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
| Jan 13, 2017* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Pablo Cuevas | 6-4 2-6 6-2 | Nicolas Mahut | Match data |
| May 10, 2016* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Nicolas Mahut | 7-6(6) 2-6 7-5 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Mahut | #1,433 | #37 | 1,122 | 1,926 | 179 | 224 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Mahut | Pablo Cuevas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #388 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2001 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #94 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #132 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2011 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #80 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2012 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #108 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2013 | 17–7 | 70.8% | #50 | 1,851 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2014 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #117 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2015 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #71 | 1,767 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | 2016 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | 2017 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #103 | 1,753 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #190 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #194 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |