H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nicolas Massu vs Francisco Clavet H2H: 1-3
Francisco Clavet holds a 3–1 lead over Nicolas Massu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Francisco Clavet leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 2001 Tokyo fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 57
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2001* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Francisco Clavet | 6-3 6-4 | Nicolas Massu | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Nicolas Massu | 7-6(13) 6-3 7-6(0) | Francisco Clavet | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2001* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Francisco Clavet | 6-4 2-6 6-3 | Nicolas Massu | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2001* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Francisco Clavet | 6-3 2-1 (ret.) | Nicolas Massu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Massu | #1,015 | #9 | 1,845 | 1,900 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Francisco Clavet | #911 | #18 | 1,613 | 1,869 | 388 | 340 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Massu | Francisco Clavet | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #583 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #290 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #87 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #188 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #90 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2002 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #56 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #30 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2003 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 39–29 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2004 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #19 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #100 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2005 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #38 | 1,795 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #44 | 1,728 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2007 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #78 | 1,619 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #34 | 1,742 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #33 | 1,832 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2009 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #112 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,557 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #38 | 1,701 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #450 | 1,551 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #49 | 1,627 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #51 | 1,620 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #876 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,567 | 0 | 8 |