H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Nicolas Massu vs Ricardo Mello H2H: 0-1
Ricardo Mello holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Massu in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ricardo Mello leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ricardo Mello won the 2001 Costa Do Sauipe fourth round 1-6 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 45
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2001* | Costa Do Sauipe | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Ricardo Mello | 1-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | Nicolas Massu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Massu | #1,015 | #9 | 1,845 | 1,900 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Ricardo Mello | #1,018 | #50 | 738 | 1,773 | 52 | 87 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nicolas Massu | Ricardo Mello | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #583 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #87 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #133 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #56 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #128 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #71 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2004 | 30–27 | 52.6% | #19 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2005 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #65 | 1,641 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #134 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #44 | 1,728 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #257 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2007 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #78 | 1,619 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2009 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #112 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #76 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2010 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,557 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #85 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #450 | 1,551 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1018 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #876 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |