H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 13:16 UTC

Nicolas Massu vs Thomas Enqvist H2H: 1-1

Nicolas Massu and Thomas Enqvist are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Massu won the 2003 US Open second round 6-3 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nicolas Massu
CHI Age 46 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 29, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Nicolas Massu #42 6-3 6-2 7-5 Thomas Enqvist #143 Match data
Aug 25, 2000* Long Island ATP 250 R16 Hard Thomas Enqvist #7 6-3 6-2 Nicolas Massu #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nicolas Massu #1,015 #9 1,845 1,900 218 217 50.1% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nicolas Massu Thomas Enqvist
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 1997 0–1 0.0% #583 1,489 0 0 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0
18 1998 0–2 0.0% #188 1,470 0 0 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2
20 2000 23–21 52.3% #87 1,640 0 0 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2
21 2001 21–27 43.8% #80 1,627 0 0 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7
22 2002 27–19 58.7% #56 1,752 0 1 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10
23 2003 35–20 63.6% #12 1,861 0 3 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11
24 2004 30–27 52.6% #19 1,738 0 4 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13
25 2005 16–21 43.2% #65 1,641 0 4 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16
26 2006 35–25 58.3% #44 1,728 0 5 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18
27 2007 15–22 40.5% #78 1,619 0 5 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18
28 2008 6–11 35.3% #77 1,583 0 5 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19
29 2009 7–11 38.9% #112 1,590 0 5 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19
30 2010 3–7 30.0% #186 1,557 0 5 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19
31 2011 0–1 0.0% #450 1,551 0 5 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19
32 2012 0–1 0.0% #618 1,537 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2013 0–1 0.0% #876 1,525 0 5 — — — — — — —