H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Nikola Pilic vs Robert Maud H2H: 2-1
Nikola Pilic holds a 2–1 lead over Robert Maud in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nikola Pilic leads 1–0 on clay, while Robert Maud leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nikola Pilic won the 1972 Cleveland Wct third round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
RSA
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1972* | Cleveland Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Nikola Pilic | 7-6 6-2 | Robert Maud | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1971* | Bristol | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Robert Maud | 6-2 6-3 | Nikola Pilic | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1970* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Nikola Pilic | 6-0 6-3 6-2 | Robert Maud | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikola Pilic | #284 | #12 | 0 | 1,953 | 301 | 248 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Robert Maud | #326 | #57 | 0 | 1,804 | 123 | 131 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikola Pilic | Robert Maud | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 29–11 | 72.5% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 21–10 | 67.7% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 22–31 | 41.5% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 6–26 | 18.8% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #73 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #62 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1968 | 42–46 | 47.7% | — | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #178 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1969 | 27–24 | 52.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1970 | 47–31 | 60.3% | — | 1,891 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1971 | 39–31 | 55.7% | — | 1,836 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1972 | 34–28 | 54.8% | — | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1973 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,840 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #32 | 1,898 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1975 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,857 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1976 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #68 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1977 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #91 | 1,701 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1978 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #284 | 1,622 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |