H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Nikolay Davydenko vs Alex Corretja H2H: 1-0
Nikolay Davydenko holds a 1–0 lead over Alex Corretja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nikolay Davydenko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2004 Monte Carlo Masters third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2004* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Nikolay Davydenko | 6-2 6-1 | Alex Corretja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikolay Davydenko | #248 | #3 | 5,335 | 2,213 | 467 | 324 | 59.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 21 |
| Alex Corretja | #1,110 | #2 | 3,550 | 2,002 | 415 | 277 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikolay Davydenko | Alex Corretja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #133 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #76 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #22 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2002 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #48 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2003 | 29–30 | 49.2% | #44 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2004 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2005 | 52–29 | 64.2% | #5 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 53–20 | 72.6% | #3 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2006 | 67–28 | 70.5% | #3 | 1,971 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2007 | 53–30 | 63.9% | #4 | 1,935 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 50–18 | 73.5% | #8 | 1,940 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 2008 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #5 | 1,974 | 0 | 14 | 2001 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,781 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 2009 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,142 | 0 | 19 | 2002 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #19 | 1,851 | 0 | 17 |
| 29 | 2010 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 20 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,650 | 0 | 17 |
| 30 | 2011 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #41 | 1,848 | 0 | 21 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 17 |
| 31 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #525 | 1,571 | 0 | 17 |
| 32 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,730 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |