H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 6-1

Nikolay Davydenko holds a 6–1 lead over Jurgen Melzer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Nikolay Davydenko leads 4–1 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nikolay Davydenko won the 2010 Rotterdam quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
6 – 1
7 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 13, 2010* Rotterdam ATP 500 QF Hard Nikolay Davydenko #6 6-3 6-2 Jurgen Melzer #32 Match data
Aug 1, 2009* Umag ATP 250 SF Clay Nikolay Davydenko #9 6-1 6-1 Jurgen Melzer #34 Match data
Apr 30, 2009* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Jurgen Melzer #31 7-5 7-6(5) Nikolay Davydenko #11 Match data
Apr 17, 2008* Estoril ATP 250 R32 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-3 6-1 Jurgen Melzer #74 Match data
Jun 14, 2007* Halle ATP 500 R32 Grass Nikolay Davydenko #3 7-6(6) 4-6 6-2 Jurgen Melzer #31 Match data
May 22, 2005* St. Poelten ATP 250 F Clay Nikolay Davydenko #13 6-3 2-6 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #47 Match data
Apr 13, 2005* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #15 5-7 6-1 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 — — — — — — — 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5