H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Nikolay Davydenko vs Milos Raonic H2H: 0-1
Milos Raonic holds a 1–0 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Milos Raonic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2013 Madrid Masters second round 7-5 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2013* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Milos Raonic | 7-5 7-6(5) | Nikolay Davydenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikolay Davydenko | #248 | #3 | 5,335 | 2,213 | 467 | 324 | 59.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 21 |
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikolay Davydenko | Milos Raonic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #133 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #79 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2002 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2003 | 29–30 | 49.2% | #44 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2004 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #28 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2005 | 52–29 | 64.2% | #5 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2006 | 67–28 | 70.5% | #3 | 1,971 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2007 | 53–30 | 63.9% | #4 | 1,935 | 0 | 11 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2008 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #5 | 1,974 | 0 | 14 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2009 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,142 | 0 | 19 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2010 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #22 | 1,897 | 0 | 20 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2011 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #41 | 1,848 | 0 | 21 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2012 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #44 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,824 | 0 | 21 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,730 | 0 | 21 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |