H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 1-2

Pablo Cuevas holds a 2–1 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Pablo Cuevas leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Nikolay Davydenko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pablo Cuevas won the 2013 Kuala Lumpur third round 6-3 6-4.

RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 2
3 main draw meetings
URU Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 26, 2013* Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 R32 Hard Pablo Cuevas #457 6-3 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #45 Match data
Oct 22, 2010* Moscow ATP 250 R16 Hard Pablo Cuevas #71 7-6(6) 7-6(5) Nikolay Davydenko #11 Match data
Jun 12, 2008* Warsaw ATP 250 R32 Clay Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-3 6-2 Pablo Cuevas #114 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,213 467 324 59.0% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Pablo Cuevas #841 #19 1,865 1,960 211 212 49.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Pablo Cuevas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,601 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #113 1,551 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2008 8–13 38.1% #142 1,631 0 0
23 2004 32–28 53.3% #28 1,758 0 4 2009 18–15 54.5% #50 1,744 0 0
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,868 0 5 2010 20–22 47.6% #63 1,760 0 0
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,971 0 10 2011 11–13 45.8% #142 1,743 0 0
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,935 0 11
27 2008 51–20 71.8% #5 1,974 0 14 2013 2–4 33.3% #220 1,718 0 0
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,142 0 19 2014 17–12 58.6% #30 1,842 0 2
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,897 0 20 2015 28–25 52.8% #40 1,815 0 3
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,848 0 21 2016 33–22 60.0% #22 1,818 0 5
31 2012 23–24 48.9% #44 1,824 0 21 2017 20–21 48.8% #32 1,788 0 6
32 2013 22–22 50.0% #53 1,824 0 21 2018 13–14 48.1% #88 1,766 0 6
33 2014 5–10 33.3% #250 1,730 0 21 2019 22–23 48.9% #45 1,740 0 6
34 2020 7–10 41.2% #67 1,691 0 6
35 2021 9–11 45.0% #97 1,651 0 6
36 2022 3–6 33.3% #269 1,654 0 6