H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Nikolay Davydenko vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 1-2

Pablo Cuevas holds a 2–1 lead over Nikolay Davydenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Pablo Cuevas leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Nikolay Davydenko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pablo Cuevas won the 2013 Kuala Lumpur round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nikolay Davydenko
RUS Age 45 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Pablo Cuevas
URU Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pablo Cuevas #457 6-3 6-4 Nikolay Davydenko #45 Match data Sep 26, 2013* R32 Kuala Lumpur ATP 250 Hard
Pablo Cuevas #71 7-6(6) 7-6(5) Nikolay Davydenko #11 Match data Oct 22, 2010* R16 Moscow ATP 250 Hard
Nikolay Davydenko #4 6-3 6-2 Pablo Cuevas #114 Match data Jun 12, 2008* R32 Warsaw International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nikolay Davydenko #248 #3 5,335 2,221 470 329 58.8% 0 3 1 1 16 21
Pablo Cuevas #841 #19 1,865 1,960 212 213 49.9% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Pablo Cuevas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2000 3–1 75.0% #133 1,544 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2001 6–15 28.6% #79 1,569 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2002 12–24 33.3% #81 1,602 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #113 1,551 0 0
22 2003 29–30 49.2% #44 1,595 0 2 2008 8–13 38.1% #142 1,633 0 0
23 2004 32–29 52.5% #28 1,756 0 4 2009 18–15 54.5% #50 1,745 0 0
24 2005 52–29 64.2% #5 1,869 0 5 2010 20–22 47.6% #63 1,760 0 0
25 2006 67–28 70.5% #3 1,970 0 10 2011 11–13 45.8% #142 1,743 0 0
26 2007 53–30 63.9% #4 1,937 0 11 — — — — — — —
27 2008 52–21 71.2% #5 1,990 0 14 2013 2–4 33.3% #220 1,716 0 0
28 2009 57–19 75.0% #6 2,152 0 19 2014 17–12 58.6% #30 1,843 0 2
29 2010 29–19 60.4% #22 1,911 0 20 2015 28–25 52.8% #40 1,815 0 3
30 2011 26–25 51.0% #41 1,840 0 21 2016 34–23 59.6% #22 1,810 0 5
31 2012 24–25 49.0% #44 1,842 0 21 2017 20–21 48.8% #32 1,787 0 6
32 2013 22–23 48.9% #53 1,822 0 21 2018 13–14 48.1% #88 1,766 0 6
33 2014 6–11 35.3% #250 1,725 0 21 2019 22–23 48.9% #45 1,741 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 2020 7–10 41.2% #67 1,691 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 2021 9–11 45.0% #97 1,651 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2022 3–6 33.3% #269 1,654 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Pablo Cuevas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2000 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 5 11 16 31.3% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2003 11 13 24 45.8% 18 12 30 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — — — — —
23 2004 7 10 17 41.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2005 21 14 35 60.0% 23 10 33 69.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 2010 8 9 17 47.1% 12 13 25 48.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2006 29 15 44 65.9% 27 9 36 75.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 11 1 12 91.7% 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — — — — —
26 2007 34 16 50 68.0% 14 11 25 56.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2008 31 15 46 67.4% 21 5 26 80.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2009 29 11 40 72.5% 26 7 33 78.8% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2014 4 5 9 44.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2010 25 14 39 64.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 8 13 21 38.1% 19 9 28 67.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2011 18 17 35 51.4% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 9 13 22 40.9% 21 8 29 72.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
31 2012 18 16 34 52.9% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 6 11 17 35.3% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — —
32 2013 17 14 31 54.8% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — 2018 4 3 7 57.1% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2014 5 7 12 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 18 12 30 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 3 3 6 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 252 179 431 58.5% 179 114 293 61.1% 10 20 30 33.3% 29 16 45 64.4% — 56 86 142 39.4% 149 116 265 56.2% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 774/799 of Nikolay Davydenko's and 421/425 of Pablo Cuevas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Pablo Cuevas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2000 4/4 1.3 2.5 73.5% 63.9% 47.2% 48.0% 69.2% 59.7% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 18/21 3.6 2.3 62.9% 64.3% 48.8% 57.8% 50.5% 58.1% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 31/36 3.2 2.8 58.7% 67.7% 46.9% 52.9% 48.2% 59.1% 38.5% 2007 1/1 1.0 5.0 43.6% 50.0% 40.9% 58.8% 14.3% 44.9% 34.6%
22 2003 58/59 2.8 2.3 66.6% 64.7% 53.0% 56.4% 39.7% 60.5% 40.8% 2008 21/21 4.1 1.9 59.3% 63.2% 54.4% 55.2% 37.5% 59.5% 35.1%
23 2004 60/61 3.3 2.7 66.2% 69.8% 49.7% 57.0% 43.6% 63.2% 40.2% 2009 33/33 7.5 2.2 63.6% 72.0% 51.8% 60.2% 47.4% 64.8% 34.6%
24 2005 81/81 3.3 2.3 67.3% 68.4% 54.3% 60.2% 45.9% 63.6% 42.7% 2010 41/42 4.7 2.2 61.6% 68.2% 47.5% 50.4% 40.6% 60.3% 37.2%
25 2006 94/95 3.2 2.1 67.9% 71.7% 54.8% 57.8% 49.3% 66.2% 44.8% 2011 24/24 5.4 1.7 59.8% 72.3% 56.0% 58.0% 41.2% 65.9% 37.8%
26 2007 82/83 3.5 3.4 67.1% 70.5% 50.0% 55.7% 49.9% 63.6% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2008 70/73 3.9 2.2 64.5% 72.4% 53.7% 58.8% 47.3% 66.0% 43.4% 2013 6/6 5.8 4.0 57.6% 69.0% 46.5% 67.5% 32.5% 59.5% 31.7%
28 2009 74/76 3.9 2.2 68.0% 72.3% 55.4% 59.8% 42.1% 66.8% 42.6% 2014 29/29 5.7 3.1 60.1% 72.0% 52.7% 47.6% 37.7% 64.2% 39.5%
29 2010 47/48 4.1 2.5 65.5% 71.7% 51.7% 58.2% 44.6% 64.7% 41.1% 2015 53/53 5.8 2.8 60.5% 71.4% 52.5% 64.8% 42.6% 63.7% 37.5%
30 2011 50/51 1.9 3.4 70.5% 65.2% 46.7% 60.4% 46.0% 59.6% 41.1% 2016 55/57 7.6 2.9 60.3% 75.8% 55.2% 62.3% 42.7% 67.5% 36.5%
31 2012 45/49 2.0 3.7 69.5% 65.6% 48.9% 62.8% 43.6% 60.4% 38.9% 2017 41/41 5.3 3.6 59.0% 72.6% 51.0% 59.7% 42.4% 63.7% 36.3%
32 2013 44/45 2.2 2.3 68.0% 66.0% 49.8% 55.6% 52.7% 60.7% 39.6% 2018 27/27 6.2 3.3 60.2% 74.3% 55.2% 57.1% 37.9% 66.4% 36.6%
33 2014 16/17 5.0 2.8 65.7% 68.0% 51.7% 59.6% 38.5% 62.7% 32.6% 2019 45/45 5.5 3.0 58.9% 74.2% 52.7% 54.8% 44.8% 65.5% 36.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 17/17 5.9 3.5 60.3% 70.5% 49.4% 60.5% 33.6% 62.2% 35.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/20 4.8 2.5 68.9% 70.3% 50.2% 58.6% 43.1% 63.8% 35.6%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 8/9 2.8 1.9 66.8% 67.4% 53.2% 60.2% 47.2% 63.3% 37.4%
Career — 774/799 3.2 2.6 66.8% 69.1% 51.8% 58.1% 46.2% 63.3% 41.6% — 421/425 5.8 2.8 60.8% 71.7% 52.3% 58.1% 41.6% 64.1% 36.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nikolay Davydenko Pablo Cuevas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2000 1544 104.3 -1.64 +0.78 1.066 51.2% — +30 — 54.5% +0.27 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2001 1569 116.8 -2.27 +0.61 0.927 48.4% -9 -6 — 34.6% -0.69 1–2 (33%) 1–6 (14%) — +0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2002 1602 132.7 -1.99 +0.74 0.940 49.0% -42 +8 — 40.5% -0.56 3–7 (30%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.81 2007 1551 110.8 +3.13 +0.76 0.628 39.7% — — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.20
22 2003 1595 135.6 -1.54 +3.36 1.035 50.5% -29 +82 — 51.1% +0.01 6–9 (40%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.03 2008 1633 124.3 -1.73 -1.88 0.867 47.8% +1 -44 — 37.5% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.48
23 2004 1757 148.6 +0.29 +3.41 1.090 51.3% -45 +23 -353 52.7% +0.25 9–12 (43%) 8–14 (36%) — -1.87 2009 1745 137.5 +0.89 -2.33 0.983 50.1% -71 +96 — 55.4% +0.08 6–6 (50%) 7–2 (78%) — +1.03
24 2005 1870 156.9 +1.31 +5.31 1.173 52.9% -23 +61 — 66.1% +1.13 9–9 (50%) 11–8 (58%) — +0.31 2010 1761 136.7 -1.96 -0.08 0.937 48.6% -45 +38 — 48.9% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 15–2 (88%) — +0.76
25 2006 1970 161.2 +3.54 +6.86 1.324 54.9% +29 +78 -575 67.0% +1.42 14–11 (56%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.78 2011 1743 138.9 +2.31 +0.26 1.110 51.3% -28 +9 — 52.6% +0.12 2–7 (22%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.08
26 2007 1938 157.3 +1.04 +5.62 1.167 52.8% +33 -5 -412 65.2% +0.94 12–13 (48%) 21–13 (62%) — +2.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2008 1991 164.4 +2.51 +6.85 1.278 54.2% +45 +72 — 69.1% +1.33 12–9 (57%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.49 2013 1717 114.3 -1.40 -3.04 0.783 46.7% -23 — — 43.8% -1.13 1–1 1–1 — +0.05
28 2009 2152 167.7 +3.74 +6.04 1.281 54.2% 0 +7 -562 73.2% +1.46 12–8 (60%) 18–5 (78%) — -0.83 2014 1843 147.6 +0.35 +2.31 1.103 51.7% -117 +98 — 54.7% +0.27 7–6 (54%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.40
29 2010 1911 158.1 +1.52 +4.28 1.164 52.6% +58 +155 -313 60.3% +0.97 7–4 (64%) 8–15 (35%) — +1.11 2015 1815 156.3 +0.03 +1.37 1.032 50.7% -98 +211 -198 50.7% +0.06 9–11 (45%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.40
30 2011 1840 158.1 -1.82 +3.60 1.017 50.4% +49 +79 — 50.0% +0.23 5–5 (50%) 7–10 (41%) — -2.67 2016 1810 152.1 +3.77 +0.09 1.125 51.7% -111 +203 -133 57.5% +0.44 12–10 (55%) 19–20 (49%) — +2.40
31 2012 1842 153.9 -2.03 +2.70 0.981 49.8% +56 -27 -236 54.9% +0.13 6–11 (35%) 8–4 (67%) — -1.90 2017 1788 154.1 +0.80 -0.10 0.998 49.9% -91 +130 — 47.6% -0.14 9–7 (56%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.79
32 2013 1822 155.8 -1.72 +3.00 1.007 50.3% +62 -78 — 49.0% +0.25 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) — -1.22 2018 1767 142.3 +1.63 +0.47 1.090 51.2% -24 +67 — 47.0% +0.24 4–4 (50%) 6–14 (30%) — +0.81
33 2014 1725 133.3 -1.67 -1.88 0.875 48.4% +111 -45 — 35.9% -0.62 2–1 (67%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.17 2019 1741 144.0 +1.27 -0.02 1.050 50.6% -34 +106 -89 49.1% +0.03 7–8 (47%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.69
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1692 131.9 -0.42 -0.37 0.941 48.8% -54 +121 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.62
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1652 127.3 +0.69 -1.10 0.984 49.6% -2 +108 — 45.1% -0.25 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.71
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1654 112.6 +0.30 -1.95 1.017 50.8% — +63 — 41.7% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.50
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1612 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1580 89.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2222 160.3 +0.75 +4.53 1.132 52.2% +22 +36 -405 59.3% +0.71 107–104 (51%) 129–121 (52%) 95.5 -0.42 — 1960 148.4 +0.77 -0.05 1.019 50.3% -70 +102 -143 49.9% -0.03 68–74 (48%) 100–95 (51%) 98.5 +1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.