H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:15 UTC
Nikoloz Basilashvili vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Nikoloz Basilashvili vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Georgia
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikoloz Basilashvili | #135 | #16 | 2,156 | 1,953 | 149 | 180 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nikoloz Basilashvili | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #59 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #21 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #26 | 1,847 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #22 | 1,865 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #596 | 1,519 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #109 | 1,704 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,654 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |