H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Nikoloz Basilashvili vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Nikoloz Basilashvili vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nikoloz Basilashvili
Georgia Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nikoloz Basilashvili #104 6-3 4-6 6-4 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #160 Match data May 23, 2016 Q2 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nikoloz Basilashvili #132 #16 2,156 1,953 151 183 45.2% 0 0 0 3 2 5
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikoloz Basilashvili Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
22 2014 0–1 0.0% #178 1,503 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2015 4–8 33.3% #113 1,646 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2016 6–9 40.0% #94 1,695 0 0 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2017 21–27 43.8% #59 1,709 0 0 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2018 29–26 52.7% #21 1,925 0 2 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2019 28–24 53.8% #26 1,846 0 3 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2020 2–11 15.4% #40 1,662 0 3 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2021 34–27 55.7% #22 1,877 0 5 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2022 15–27 35.7% #91 1,645 0 5 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2023 1–5 16.7% #596 1,519 0 5 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0
33 2025 7–10 41.2% #109 1,704 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2026 4–8 33.3% #132 1,601 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nikoloz Basilashvili Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
22 2014 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2016 2 7 9 22.2% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2018 16 14 30 53.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 2019 17 15 32 53.1% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2020 2 7 9 22.2% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2021 21 16 37 56.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2022 6 15 21 28.6% 5 9 14 35.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 2023 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2025 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 86 107 193 44.6% 49 56 105 46.7% 16 20 36 44.4% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 328/334 of Nikoloz Basilashvili's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nikoloz Basilashvili Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
22 2014 1/1 4.0 5.0 59.2% 68.9% 45.2% 50.0% 25.0% 59.2% 37.7% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2015 12/12 3.1 4.1 67.1% 64.8% 50.0% 58.0% 40.4% 59.9% 34.9% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2016 14/15 3.0 4.4 62.5% 66.5% 48.3% 49.3% 51.4% 59.4% 36.4% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2017 48/48 2.9 3.2 64.6% 65.1% 48.8% 56.4% 41.4% 59.1% 36.8% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2018 55/55 4.3 5.0 57.9% 68.8% 50.8% 58.6% 39.0% 61.1% 35.8% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2019 52/52 5.5 5.8 57.9% 69.8% 50.5% 55.6% 42.7% 61.6% 37.4% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2020 13/13 4.8 5.5 55.5% 64.0% 41.9% 56.0% 29.6% 54.0% 31.5% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2021 57/61 4.1 3.6 56.6% 68.6% 49.8% 54.9% 45.7% 60.2% 38.5% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2022 41/42 3.4 3.9 56.8% 68.3% 45.3% 51.3% 37.4% 58.5% 33.0% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2023 6/6 5.7 5.8 57.5% 66.4% 48.8% 52.3% 31.7% 58.8% 31.3% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
33 2025 17/17 7.1 4.1 54.5% 75.6% 49.8% 49.1% 31.1% 63.6% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 12/12 6.4 5.1 52.5% 76.0% 42.8% 48.3% 28.7% 60.3% 33.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 328/334 4.3 4.4 58.5% 68.5% 48.7% 54.7% 40.1% 60.1% 35.9% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nikoloz Basilashvili Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2010 1500 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2012 1507 100.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 1503 102.1 -0.47 -1.04 0.925 48.3% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.02 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20
23 2015 1646 127.9 -3.62 +0.36 0.869 47.5% -53 — +89 36.4% -1.15 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 96.6 +0.40 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24
24 2016 1695 133.3 -2.54 +0.55 0.896 48.2% -53 +11 — 40.0% -0.73 4–3 (57%) 5–3 (63%) 105.2 +0.54 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95
25 2017 1710 143.7 -3.72 +0.73 0.900 48.3% -4 +32 -94 48.7% -0.43 5–9 (36%) 14–6 (70%) 104.8 +0.23 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72
26 2018 1925 145.4 -1.94 +0.41 0.921 48.8% -58 -56 -307 51.5% -0.21 10–6 (63%) 14–8 (64%) 111.3 +0.90 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11
27 2019 1846 151.2 -1.41 +1.47 0.975 49.7% -17 +74 -261 52.1% -0.03 14–12 (54%) 12–11 (52%) 102.3 +1.18 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22
28 2020 1662 121.4 -4.59 -2.25 0.684 43.1% +48 +145 — 20.0% -1.94 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 99.4 +0.04 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44
29 2021 1877 151.7 -2.27 +1.92 0.966 49.4% -21 -78 -172 52.4% -0.01 12–9 (57%) 14–6 (70%) 111.2 +1.50 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04
30 2022 1646 128.2 -3.90 -2.26 0.795 46.0% +29 +49 +81 35.8% -1.28 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) 100.3 +0.91 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22
31 2023 1519 107.7 -1.85 -2.96 0.760 45.4% +33 — — 25.0% -1.31 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.32 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2024 1518 101.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 2025 1704 124.5 -1.36 -0.34 0.948 49.4% +23 -99 — 50.0% +0.14 1–3 (25%) 5–6 (45%) 97.0 -0.17 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 1602 114.1 -1.73 -0.89 0.832 47.2% — +65 — 35.7% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 98.4 +0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1953 141.2 -2.57 +0.30 0.899 48.2% -13 +8 -122 45.9% -0.46 56–56 (50%) 79–61 (56%) 110.2 +1.92 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.