H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Nikoloz Basilashvili vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 1-1

Nikoloz Basilashvili and Dominic Thiem are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2019 Shanghai Masters third round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nikoloz Basilashvili
Georgia Age 34 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominic Thiem #5 6-3 6-4 Nikoloz Basilashvili #26 Match data Oct 11, 2019* R16 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Nikoloz Basilashvili #87 6-4 6-4 Dominic Thiem #8 Match data Feb 10, 2017* R16 Sofia ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nikoloz Basilashvili #132 #16 2,156 1,953 151 183 45.2% 0 0 0 3 2 5
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nikoloz Basilashvili Dominic Thiem
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3
22 2014 0–1 0.0% #178 1,503 0 0 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7
23 2015 4–8 33.3% #113 1,646 0 0 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8
24 2016 6–9 40.0% #94 1,695 0 0 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11
25 2017 21–27 43.8% #59 1,709 0 0 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16
26 2018 29–26 52.7% #21 1,925 0 2 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17
27 2019 28–24 53.8% #26 1,846 0 3 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17
28 2020 2–11 15.4% #40 1,662 0 3 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17
29 2021 34–27 55.7% #22 1,877 0 5 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17
30 2022 15–27 35.7% #91 1,645 0 5 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17
31 2023 1–5 16.7% #596 1,519 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2025 7–10 41.2% #109 1,704 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2026 4–8 33.3% #132 1,601 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nikoloz Basilashvili Dominic Thiem
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 2014 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0%
23 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2016 2 7 9 22.2% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2018 16 14 30 53.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
27 2019 17 15 32 53.1% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2020 2 7 9 22.2% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — —
29 2021 21 16 37 56.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2022 6 15 21 28.6% 5 9 14 35.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2023 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 86 107 193 44.6% 49 56 105 46.7% 16 20 36 44.4% — 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 328/334 of Nikoloz Basilashvili's and 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Nikoloz Basilashvili Dominic Thiem
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1%
22 2014 1/1 4.0 5.0 59.2% 68.9% 45.2% 50.0% 25.0% 59.2% 37.7% 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4%
23 2015 12/12 3.1 4.1 67.1% 64.8% 50.0% 58.0% 40.4% 59.9% 34.9% 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5%
24 2016 14/15 3.0 4.4 62.5% 66.5% 48.3% 49.3% 51.4% 59.4% 36.4% 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4%
25 2017 48/48 2.9 3.2 64.6% 65.1% 48.8% 56.4% 41.4% 59.1% 36.8% 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0%
26 2018 55/55 4.3 5.0 57.9% 68.8% 50.8% 58.6% 39.0% 61.1% 35.8% 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0%
27 2019 52/52 5.5 5.8 57.9% 69.8% 50.5% 55.6% 42.7% 61.6% 37.4% 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4%
28 2020 13/13 4.8 5.5 55.5% 64.0% 41.9% 56.0% 29.6% 54.0% 31.5% 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5%
29 2021 57/61 4.1 3.6 56.6% 68.6% 49.8% 54.9% 45.7% 60.2% 38.5% 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1%
30 2022 41/42 3.4 3.9 56.8% 68.3% 45.3% 51.3% 37.4% 58.5% 33.0% 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8%
31 2023 6/6 5.7 5.8 57.5% 66.4% 48.8% 52.3% 31.7% 58.8% 31.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 17/17 7.1 4.1 54.5% 75.6% 49.8% 49.1% 31.1% 63.6% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 12/12 6.4 5.1 52.5% 76.0% 42.8% 48.3% 28.7% 60.3% 33.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 328/334 4.3 4.4 58.5% 68.5% 48.7% 54.7% 40.1% 60.1% 35.9% — 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nikoloz Basilashvili Dominic Thiem
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1491 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.02
18 2010 1500 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — +0.16
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 — 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 — +0.35
20 2012 1507 100.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 — 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 104.7 -1.38
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) 97.2 +0.34
22 2014 1503 102.1 -0.47 -1.04 0.925 48.3% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.02 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) 118.6 -0.64
23 2015 1646 127.9 -3.62 +0.36 0.869 47.5% -53 — +89 36.4% -1.15 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 96.6 +0.40 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) 93.6 +0.76
24 2016 1695 133.3 -2.54 +0.55 0.896 48.2% -53 +11 — 40.0% -0.73 4–3 (57%) 5–3 (63%) 105.2 +0.54 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) 103.1 +0.03
25 2017 1710 143.7 -3.72 +0.73 0.900 48.3% -4 +32 -94 48.7% -0.43 5–9 (36%) 14–6 (70%) 104.8 +0.23 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 — 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) 111.2 -1.32
26 2018 1925 145.4 -1.94 +0.41 0.921 48.8% -58 -56 -307 51.5% -0.21 10–6 (63%) 14–8 (64%) 111.3 +0.90 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 — 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) 102.9 -2.09
27 2019 1846 151.2 -1.41 +1.47 0.975 49.7% -17 +74 -261 52.1% -0.03 14–12 (54%) 12–11 (52%) 102.3 +1.18 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 — 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 97.8 +0.26
28 2020 1662 121.4 -4.59 -2.25 0.684 43.1% +48 +145 — 20.0% -1.94 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 99.4 +0.04 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 — 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) 103.9 -2.20
29 2021 1877 151.7 -2.27 +1.92 0.966 49.4% -21 -78 -172 52.4% -0.01 12–9 (57%) 14–6 (70%) 111.2 +1.50 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 — 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) 96.8 -1.03
30 2022 1646 128.2 -3.90 -2.26 0.795 46.0% +29 +49 +81 35.8% -1.28 4–6 (40%) 9–7 (56%) 100.3 +0.91 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 — 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.8 -0.23
31 2023 1519 107.7 -1.85 -2.96 0.760 45.4% +33 — — 25.0% -1.31 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 1518 101.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 1704 124.5 -1.36 -0.34 0.948 49.4% +23 -99 — 50.0% +0.14 1–3 (25%) 5–6 (45%) 97.0 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 1602 114.1 -1.73 -0.89 0.832 47.2% — +65 — 35.7% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 98.4 +0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1953 141.2 -2.57 +0.30 0.899 48.2% -13 +8 -122 45.9% -0.46 56–56 (50%) 79–61 (56%) 110.2 +1.92 — 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.