H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:17 UTC
Norbert Gombos vs Radu Albot H2H: 1-0
Norbert Gombos holds a 1–0 lead over Radu Albot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Norbert Gombos leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Norbert Gombos won the 2020 US Open first round 6-4 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Slovakia
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Moldova
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2025* | Generali Open | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Norbert Gombos | 6-3 6-4 | Radu Albot | Match data |
| Nov 2, 2020 | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Norbert Gombos | 7-5 4-6 6-4 | Radu Albot | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2020* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Norbert Gombos | 6-4 6-1 6-4 | Radu Albot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Norbert Gombos | #370 | #80 | 912 | 1,794 | 22 | 46 | 32.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Radu Albot | #490 | #39 | 1,137 | 1,899 | 89 | 139 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Norbert Gombos | Radu Albot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2017 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #132 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2018 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #109 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2020 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #88 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #46 | 1,817 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2021 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #118 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2022 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #114 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #103 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #163 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |