H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Norbert Gombos vs Viktor Troicki H2H: 0-1

Viktor Troicki holds a 1–0 lead over Norbert Gombos in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Viktor Troicki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Viktor Troicki won the 2017 US Open first round 3-6 6-3 3-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Norbert Gombos
Slovakia Age 36 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Viktor Troicki
SRB Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Viktor Troicki #52 3-6 6-3 3-6 6-4 6-3 Norbert Gombos #84 Match data Aug 30, 2017* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Norbert Gombos #369 #80 912 1,796 22 47 31.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Viktor Troicki #1,433 #12 2,015 2,006 270 259 51.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Norbert Gombos Viktor Troicki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2006 1–1 50.0% #211 1,496 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2007 5–7 41.7% #127 1,634 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2008 19–19 50.0% #57 1,791 0 0
23 2014 0–2 0.0% #126 1,552 0 0 2009 27–27 50.0% #29 1,805 0 0
24 2015 0–2 0.0% #138 1,577 0 0 2010 36–25 59.0% #28 1,925 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 2011 34–24 58.6% #22 1,846 0 1
26 2017 3–10 23.1% #132 1,573 0 0 2012 21–27 43.8% #38 1,766 0 1
27 2018 0–3 0.0% #247 1,569 0 0 2013 18–18 50.0% #75 1,824 0 1
28 2019 2–1 66.7% #109 1,591 0 0 2014 8–4 66.7% #101 1,903 0 1
29 2020 7–8 46.7% #88 1,789 0 0 2015 33–27 55.0% #22 1,847 0 2
30 2021 7–14 33.3% #118 1,637 0 0 2016 33–28 54.1% #29 1,896 0 3
31 2022 2–6 25.0% #114 1,652 0 0 2017 23–28 45.1% #55 1,814 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 2018 6–13 31.6% #205 1,668 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2019 4–4 50.0% #158 1,643 0 3
34 2025 1–1 50.0% #299 1,625 0 0 2020 1–3 25.0% #201 1,648 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2021 1–4 20.0% #232 1,650 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Norbert Gombos Viktor Troicki
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 19 17 36 52.8% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 28 17 45 62.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 24 17 41 58.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2017 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 13 17 30 43.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
27 2018 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 3 7 10 30.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 2019 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2014 6 3 9 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2015 19 17 36 52.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4%
30 2021 0 7 7 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2016 27 20 47 57.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 2022 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2017 16 19 35 45.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 5 10 15 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
34 2025 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2020 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 10 29 39 25.6% 12 13 25 48.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — 179 168 347 51.6% 58 60 118 49.2% 33 31 64 51.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 68/69 of Norbert Gombos's and 521/529 of Viktor Troicki's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Norbert Gombos Viktor Troicki
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/2 8.0 1.0 61.4% 70.4% 53.0% 43.3% 63.9% 63.8% 37.0%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 12/12 4.2 3.7 59.0% 64.4% 42.5% 46.9% 45.4% 55.6% 37.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 37/38 6.2 2.2 61.7% 73.4% 51.5% 51.7% 37.9% 65.0% 37.2%
23 2014 2/2 6.5 7.0 63.0% 69.5% 42.7% 61.3% 61.5% 59.6% 32.5% 2009 54/54 6.9 2.6 57.6% 70.1% 44.7% 60.8% 46.7% 58.8% 36.4%
24 2015 2/2 3.5 5.5 52.4% 60.6% 41.7% 50.0% 41.7% 51.7% 39.4% 2010 59/61 9.2 2.9 60.1% 75.0% 50.6% 59.4% 46.1% 64.9% 41.3%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 58/58 7.9 2.4 58.9% 72.9% 47.2% 63.6% 47.1% 62.2% 39.9%
26 2017 13/13 6.1 4.8 62.9% 71.8% 41.3% 64.6% 29.7% 60.7% 35.1% 2012 47/48 8.1 2.3 59.7% 70.0% 44.0% 52.2% 42.4% 59.3% 36.5%
27 2018 3/3 6.0 6.0 57.8% 73.4% 45.9% 62.5% 3.0% 61.6% 27.5% 2013 36/36 6.7 2.1 59.6% 70.5% 47.5% 49.6% 43.4% 61.2% 37.5%
28 2019 3/3 5.7 3.7 60.6% 75.9% 44.4% 59.9% 31.1% 63.5% 29.1% 2014 12/12 9.1 2.2 55.0% 79.4% 52.5% 59.5% 45.9% 66.9% 40.2%
29 2020 15/15 4.9 3.4 61.4% 70.5% 48.4% 54.5% 40.1% 62.2% 37.7% 2015 60/60 10.0 2.0 62.9% 74.5% 49.8% 57.1% 41.3% 65.5% 36.2%
30 2021 20/21 5.4 3.1 62.0% 69.2% 45.4% 52.3% 35.8% 60.4% 34.9% 2016 60/61 8.5 2.3 61.2% 74.2% 49.9% 56.0% 40.2% 64.7% 36.7%
31 2022 8/8 4.0 4.0 64.2% 69.4% 48.4% 51.4% 33.5% 61.8% 30.9% 2017 49/51 6.6 3.2 60.7% 71.2% 46.7% 53.9% 41.1% 61.8% 35.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 19/19 8.2 3.2 63.5% 69.8% 41.2% 53.1% 33.5% 59.3% 33.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 8/8 8.0 4.3 62.0% 72.5% 51.7% 53.0% 46.4% 64.7% 33.0%
34 2025 2/2 7.5 1.0 62.0% 69.0% 68.0% 73.5% 19.0% 69.0% 35.0% 2020 3/4 8.3 1.3 72.0% 67.1% 48.2% 57.3% 32.3% 61.5% 31.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 5/5 7.8 1.2 63.5% 74.1% 55.0% 44.1% 19.9% 66.4% 26.2%
Career — 68/69 5.3 3.9 61.8% 70.2% 46.1% 56.6% 34.1% 61.2% 34.6% — 521/529 7.9 2.5 60.4% 72.4% 47.9% 56.1% 42.7% 62.6% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Norbert Gombos Viktor Troicki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2011 1483 95.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1497 108.2 +2.42 +2.63 1.020 50.3% — — — 40.0% +0.60 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.15
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1634 117.7 -4.28 -0.04 0.852 47.0% -40 +23 — 44.4% -0.89 3–2 (60%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.12
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1791 139.5 +1.49 +1.42 1.065 50.4% +8 -175 -178 49.4% -0.01 4–6 (40%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.41
23 2014 1553 118.2 -2.00 -0.19 0.804 46.9% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — -0.11 2009 1806 148.2 -2.68 +0.14 0.884 48.1% +16 -130 -137 48.4% -0.29 9–5 (64%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.24
24 2015 1578 113.6 +0.61 -0.67 0.815 45.4% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.23 2010 1925 159.4 +1.84 +4.42 1.176 52.7% +14 -165 -279 57.0% +0.59 8–9 (47%) 9–12 (43%) — -1.68
25 2016 1531 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1847 157.5 +0.04 +2.75 1.056 51.0% +36 +1 -155 58.3% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 9–11 (45%) — +1.82
26 2017 1573 129.1 -2.65 -0.86 0.892 48.2% +22 +15 — 34.3% -0.77 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.74 2012 1766 146.1 -2.61 -0.08 0.896 48.1% -2 +12 -4 45.3% -0.24 10–8 (56%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.30
27 2018 1569 113.1 -2.33 -0.17 0.716 44.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–3 (0%) — +0.04 2013 1825 139.7 -1.42 -0.04 0.966 49.1% -123 +24 -40 51.1% -0.08 5–3 (63%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.52
28 2019 1591 120.4 -1.16 +0.26 0.799 46.8% +19 — — 57.1% -0.57 1–0 2–0 — +0.08 2014 1904 142.7 +2.91 +1.97 1.214 53.2% -67 -35 — 62.5% +0.75 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.99
29 2020 1790 139.0 +0.72 +0.20 0.997 49.5% -20 -174 — 47.6% -0.17 1–1 3–3 (50%) — -0.05 2015 1847 149.3 +0.59 +0.86 1.051 50.6% -26 -34 +98 51.5% +0.18 14–8 (64%) 14–17 (45%) — +1.04
30 2021 1638 123.4 -1.83 -2.43 0.880 47.8% -40 +69 — 36.2% -0.79 5–4 (56%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.19 2016 1896 159.7 +1.47 +0.63 1.039 50.5% +8 -14 -47 50.6% -0.07 14–7 (67%) 18–7 (72%) — +0.26
31 2022 1652 117.8 -0.08 -2.51 0.811 46.5% -7 +34 — 32.0% -1.16 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.22 2017 1814 148.1 -1.84 -0.08 0.926 48.5% +24 +20 -93 43.4% -0.58 9–5 (64%) 13–8 (62%) — -1.56
32 2023 1594 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1668 123.1 -3.95 -1.30 0.822 46.3% +48 +95 — 33.3% -0.92 5–5 (50%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.36
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1643 117.7 +0.21 -1.72 0.935 48.8% +10 — +142 47.8% -0.39 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.39
34 2025 1626 110.6 -1.01 -1.72 1.129 52.5% — — — 60.0% +0.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.01 2020 1648 116.8 -1.33 -1.24 0.824 47.6% +41 — — 37.5% -0.25 1–1 0–1 — +0.12
35 2026 1603 97.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1650 110.9 +0.71 -3.52 0.779 46.0% — — — 30.8% -0.92 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.04
Career — 1797 126.2 -1.12 -1.20 0.890 47.9% -9 +22 — 37.0% -0.74 9–13 (41%) 15–19 (44%) 98.0 -1.52 — 2006 151.3 -0.39 +1.02 0.995 49.8% +6 -32 -45 49.9% -0.05 91–69 (57%) 106–105 (50%) 103.5 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.