H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Novak Djokovic vs Gilles Simon H2H: 10-1
Novak Djokovic holds a 10–1 lead over Gilles Simon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 8–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2017 Monte Carlo Masters third round 6-3 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
10
–
1
11 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2017* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Jan 26, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-7(1) 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Nov 6, 2015* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 7-5 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2014* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 6-2 6-4 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2010* | Beijing | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-2 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Oct 17, 2009* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2009* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 7-5 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Feb 28, 2009* | Dubai | ATP 500 | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 3-6 7-5 7-5 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Nov 16, 2008* | Masters Cup | ATP Finals | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2008* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Gilles Simon | 6-2 6-7(6) 6-3 | Novak Djokovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | #7 | #1 | 16,950 | 2,593 | 1,122 | 223 | 83.4% | 24 | 40 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 100 |
| Gilles Simon | #464 | #6 | 4,170 | 2,093 | 493 | 379 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Novak Djokovic | Gilles Simon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 58–15 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,120 | 1 | 11 | 2006 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 78–17 | 82.1% | #3 | 2,267 | 1 | 16 | 2007 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2010 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,166 | 1 | 18 | 2008 | 50–26 | 65.8% | #7 | 1,981 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2011 | 72–6 | 92.3% | #1 | 2,357 | 4 | 28 | 2009 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,936 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2012 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,429 | 5 | 34 | 2010 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #41 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2013 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #2 | 2,469 | 6 | 41 | 2011 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #12 | 1,905 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2014 | 65–8 | 89.0% | #1 | 2,463 | 7 | 48 | 2012 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 1,959 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2015 | 82–6 | 93.2% | #1 | 2,554 | 10 | 59 | 2013 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #19 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2016 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,450 | 12 | 66 | 2014 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #21 | 1,953 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2017 | 31–8 | 79.5% | #12 | 2,293 | 12 | 68 | 2015 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,990 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 2018 | 53–12 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,332 | 14 | 72 | 2016 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,937 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | 2019 | 55–11 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 16 | 77 | 2017 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #89 | 1,764 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 2020 | 35–5 | 87.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 17 | 81 | 2018 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,861 | 0 | 14 |
| 34 | 2021 | 46–5 | 90.2% | #1 | 2,372 | 20 | 86 | 2019 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #55 | 1,773 | 0 | 14 |
| 35 | 2022 | 42–6 | 87.5% | #5 | 2,368 | 21 | 91 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 14 |
| 36 | 2023 | 54–6 | 90.0% | #1 | 2,405 | 24 | 98 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #122 | 1,634 | 0 | 14 |
| 37 | 2024 | 29–9 | 76.3% | #7 | 2,226 | 24 | 98 | 2022 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 |
| 38 | 2025 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #4 | 2,174 | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2026 | 15–5 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,155 | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |