H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Novak Djokovic vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 14-0
Novak Djokovic holds a 14–0 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 14 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 8–0 on hard courts and 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2021 Australian Open first round 6-3 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
14
–
0
14 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2021* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-1 6-2 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
| May 10, 2019* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-1 7-6(2) | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
| Oct 10, 2018* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 7-5 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2018* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Novak Djokovic | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
| Aug 15, 2015* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 6-4 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
| May 29, 2014* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-1 6-4 6-2 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2014* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 6-3 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
| Jun 30, 2013* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Novak Djokovic | 6-3 6-2 6-2 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Novak Djokovic | 6-4 6-1 6-1 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2010* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 6-2 6-3 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
| Apr 28, 2010* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-1 6-1 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
| Aug 21, 2009* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-5 6-3 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
| Feb 19, 2009* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
| Jan 22, 2009* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Novak Djokovic | 7-5 6-1 6-3 | Jeremy Chardy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | #7 | #1 | 16,950 | 2,593 | 1,122 | 223 | 83.4% | 24 | 40 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 100 |
| Jeremy Chardy | #1,077 | #25 | 1,486 | 1,968 | 290 | 303 | 48.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Novak Djokovic | Jeremy Chardy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,067 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 58–15 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,120 | 1 | 11 | 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #75 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 78–17 | 82.1% | #3 | 2,267 | 1 | 16 | 2009 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #32 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,166 | 1 | 18 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #45 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 72–6 | 92.3% | #1 | 2,357 | 4 | 28 | 2011 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #103 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,429 | 5 | 34 | 2012 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #32 | 1,822 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #2 | 2,469 | 6 | 41 | 2013 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #34 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 65–8 | 89.0% | #1 | 2,463 | 7 | 48 | 2014 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 82–6 | 93.2% | #1 | 2,554 | 10 | 59 | 2015 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,896 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2016 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,450 | 12 | 66 | 2016 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #69 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2017 | 31–8 | 79.5% | #12 | 2,293 | 12 | 68 | 2017 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #78 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2018 | 53–12 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,332 | 14 | 72 | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #40 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2019 | 55–11 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,264 | 16 | 77 | 2019 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2020 | 35–5 | 87.5% | #1 | 2,275 | 17 | 81 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #75 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2021 | 46–5 | 90.2% | #1 | 2,372 | 20 | 86 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #107 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2022 | 42–6 | 87.5% | #5 | 2,368 | 21 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 54–6 | 90.0% | #1 | 2,405 | 24 | 98 | 2023 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #519 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | 2024 | 29–9 | 76.3% | #7 | 2,226 | 24 | 98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2025 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #4 | 2,174 | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2026 | 15–5 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,155 | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |