H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Novak Djokovic vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 3-1

Novak Djokovic holds a 3–1 lead over Jurgen Melzer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Novak Djokovic leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jurgen Melzer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2012 Beijing quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Novak Djokovic
Serbia Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 6, 2012* Beijing ATP 500 QF Hard Novak Djokovic #2 6-1 6-2 Jurgen Melzer #37 Match data
Jun 3, 2010* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Jurgen Melzer #27 3-6 2-6 6-2 7-6(3) 6-4 Novak Djokovic #3 Match data
Jun 13, 2009* Halle ATP 500 QF Grass Novak Djokovic #4 6-1 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #28 Match data
Oct 8, 2006* Metz ATP 250 F Hard Novak Djokovic #22 4-6 6-3 6-2 Jurgen Melzer #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Novak Djokovic #7 #1 16,950 2,593 1,122 223 83.4% 24 40 7 14 15 100
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Novak Djokovic Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 1–3 25.0% #186 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 9–9 50.0% #78 1,732 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 2006 35–17 67.3% #16 1,884 0 2 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2007 65–19 77.4% #3 2,067 0 7 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2008 58–15 79.5% #3 2,120 1 11 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2009 78–17 82.1% #3 2,267 1 16 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2010 56–18 75.7% #3 2,166 1 18 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2011 72–6 92.3% #1 2,357 4 28 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2012 71–10 87.7% #1 2,429 5 34 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2013 67–9 88.2% #2 2,469 6 41 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2014 65–8 89.0% #1 2,463 7 48 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2015 82–6 93.2% #1 2,554 10 59 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2016 64–8 88.9% #2 2,450 12 66 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2017 31–8 79.5% #12 2,293 12 68 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2018 53–12 81.5% #1 2,332 14 72 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2019 55–11 83.3% #2 2,264 16 77 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2020 35–5 87.5% #1 2,275 17 81 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 2021 46–5 90.2% #1 2,372 20 86 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 2022 42–6 87.5% #5 2,368 21 91 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 2023 54–6 90.0% #1 2,405 24 98 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 2024 29–9 76.3% #7 2,226 24 98 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5
38 2025 39–11 78.0% #4 2,174 24 100 — — — — — — —
39 2026 15–5 75.0% #7 2,155 24 100 — — — — — — —