H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Novak Djokovic vs Matthew Ebden H2H: 1-0
Novak Djokovic holds a 1–0 lead over Matthew Ebden in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Novak Djokovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Novak Djokovic won the 2024 Paris Olympics second round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2024* | Paris Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Clay | Novak Djokovic | 6-0 6-1 | Matthew Ebden | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | Olympics | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novak Djokovic | #7 | #1 | 16,950 | 2,593 | 1,141 | 229 | 83.3% | 24 | 1 | 40 | 7 | 14 | 15 | 101 |
| Matthew Ebden | #970 | #39 | 1,134 | 1,848 | 75 | 130 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Novak Djokovic | Matthew Ebden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,068 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 63–16 | 79.7% | #3 | 2,130 | 1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 78–17 | 82.1% | #3 | 2,273 | 1 | 16 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 56–18 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,163 | 1 | 18 | 2011 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 72–6 | 92.3% | #1 | 2,382 | 4 | 28 | 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #105 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 75–12 | 86.2% | #1 | 2,425 | 5 | 34 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #68 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 67–9 | 88.2% | #2 | 2,471 | 6 | 41 | 2014 | 5–21 | 19.2% | #231 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 65–8 | 89.0% | #1 | 2,450 | 7 | 48 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #105 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 82–6 | 93.2% | #1 | 2,554 | 10 | 59 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #698 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 64–9 | 87.7% | #2 | 2,429 | 12 | 66 | 2017 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #76 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2017 | 31–8 | 79.5% | #12 | 2,280 | 12 | 68 | 2018 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #46 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2018 | 53–12 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,332 | 14 | 72 | 2019 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #244 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2019 | 55–11 | 83.3% | #2 | 2,262 | 16 | 77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2020 | 35–5 | 87.5% | #1 | 2,276 | 17 | 81 | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #237 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2021 | 50–7 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,338 | 20 | 86 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #740 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2022 | 42–6 | 87.5% | #5 | 2,353 | 21 | 91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 54–6 | 90.0% | #1 | 2,401 | 24 | 98 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | 2024 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #7 | 2,272 | 24 | 99 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | 2025 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #4 | 2,191 | 24 | 101 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2026 | 15–5 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,166 | 24 | 101 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |