H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Oleg Ogorodov vs Johan Van Herck H2H: 0-2

Johan Van Herck holds a 2–0 lead over Oleg Ogorodov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Johan Van Herck leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Johan Van Herck won the 1996 Tel Aviv round of 32 6-4 6-4.

UZB Age 54 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 2
2 main-draw meetings
BEL Age 52 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Johan Van Herck 6-4 6-4 Oleg Ogorodov #119 Match data Oct 17, 1996* R32 Tel Aviv World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Johan Van Herck 6-4 6-4 Oleg Ogorodov #113 Match data Mar 14, 1996* R32 Copenhagen World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Oleg Ogorodov #1,528 #101 469 1,564 20 46 30.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johan Van Herck 1,662 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Oleg Ogorodov Johan Van Herck
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1994 0–1 0.0% #264 1,494 0 0
22 1995 4–5 44.4% #112 1,516 0 0
23 1996 8–17 32.0% #140 1,493 0 0
24 1997 4–11 26.7% #142 1,454 0 0
25 1998 0–2 0.0% #225 1,433 0 0
26 1999 0–2 0.0% #132 1,414 0 0
27 2000 0–2 0.0% #230 1,406 0 0
28 2001 1–1 50.0% #148 1,461 0 0
29 2002 3–5 37.5% #166 1,533 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Oleg Ogorodov Johan Van Herck
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1991 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1994 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
23 1996 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1997 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 0 7 7 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 1998 0 2 2 0.0% 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2000 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2001 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2002 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 11 23 34 32.4% 4 11 15 26.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 12 25 37 32.4% 22 25 47 46.8% 0 6 6 0.0% 10 15 25 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Oleg Ogorodov Johan Van Herck
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1991 1493 102.9 33.3% -1.00 0–1 -0.06
19 1993 1492 110.8 0.0% -3.00 -0.20
20 1994 1502 120.0 +20 22.2% -1.33 1–0 0–2 -0.38
21 1994 1494 103.6 +0.84 -1.99 0.674 40.0% 0.0% -3.50 -0.15 1995 1506 105.8 +29 +8 33.3% -0.90 0–2 2–2 (50%) +0.48
22 1995 1517 109.3 +0.93 -1.21 0.988 49.5% +25 42.9% -0.62 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) +0.72 1996 1598 121.9 -12 -12 44.2% -0.64 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) 98.4 +0.80
23 1996 1494 113.3 -1.81 -2.36 0.896 48.6% +41 +34 +56 35.6% -0.80 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 +1.69 1997 1631 127.8 -25 -8 44.3% -0.41 3–5 (38%) 5–4 (56%) 99.7 -1.24
24 1997 1454 110.3 -1.81 -1.27 0.877 47.9% +59 +58 37.5% -1.08 2–6 (25%) 1–5 (17%) 93.6 +0.70 1998 1523 114.8 +23 +65 41.4% -0.67 3–7 (30%) 8–8 (50%) 97.5 +0.49
25 1998 1434 95.4 -1.88 -1.28 0.525 38.3% 20.0% -2.60 0–1 +0.21 1999 1536 113.2 +46 47.1% -0.29 1–2 (33%) +0.16
26 1999 1415 102.2 -1.55 +0.35 0.823 46.2% 20.0% -2.00 0–1 0–1 +0.21 2000 1554 103.9
27 2000 1407 106.1 -1.21 +0.53 0.774 46.6% 20.0% -1.20 0–1 +0.14
28 2001 1462 102.0 -2.51 -1.13 0.876 46.8% 50.0% -1.25 2–0 +0.12
29 2002 1533 115.1 -1.01 -2.05 0.799 46.1% -32 +44 40.9% -0.73 1–1 1–2 (33%) +0.11
30 2003 1540 100.8
Career 1565 113.6 -1.26 -1.56 0.855 47.4% +33 +49 +56 36.2% -0.98 9–15 (38%) 7–11 (39%) 95.4 +5.68 1662 125.2 -1 +18 41.6% -0.63 10–20 (33%) 20–22 (48%) 95.0 +0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.