H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Olivier Rochus vs Albert Montanes H2H: 2-1
Olivier Rochus holds a 2–1 lead over Albert Montanes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Olivier Rochus leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Albert Montanes leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Olivier Rochus won the 2006 Auckland third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 45
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2008 | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Olivier Rochus | 3-6 7-6(1) 6-1 | Albert Montanes | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2006* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Olivier Rochus | 6-2 6-4 | Albert Montanes | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2005* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Olivier Rochus | 4-6 6-2 6-1 6-3 | Albert Montanes | Match data |
| Sep 13, 2001* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Albert Montanes | 6-1 6-1 | Olivier Rochus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivier Rochus | #1,179 | #24 | 1,160 | 1,866 | 220 | 256 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Albert Montanes | #335 | #22 | 1,770 | 1,920 | 257 | 287 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olivier Rochus | Albert Montanes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #114 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #65 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #78 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #99 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #71 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #122 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #45 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2009 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #31 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2010 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #25 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #53 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2012 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #96 | 1,634 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,673 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #108 | 1,693 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,697 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #164 | 1,637 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #335 | 1,612 | 0 | 6 |