H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Olivier Rochus vs Jiri Vanek H2H: 1-0
Olivier Rochus holds a 1–0 lead over Jiri Vanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Olivier Rochus leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Olivier Rochus won the 2006 Roland Garros second round 6-2 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2006* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Olivier Rochus | 6-2 6-0 6-2 | Jiri Vanek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivier Rochus | #1,179 | #24 | 1,160 | 1,866 | 220 | 256 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jiri Vanek | #1,543 | #74 | 796 | 1,644 | 67 | 120 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Olivier Rochus | Jiri Vanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #495 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #114 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2003 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #143 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #115 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #122 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #99 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #102 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #101 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #124 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2012 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,673 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |