H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Olivier Rochus vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0
Olivier Rochus holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Olivier Rochus leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Olivier Rochus won the 2008 Poertschach third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 45
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2008* | Poertschach | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Olivier Rochus | 6-2 6-4 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivier Rochus | #1,179 | #24 | 1,160 | 1,866 | 220 | 256 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Olivier Rochus | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #114 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #64 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #48 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #122 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,751 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,673 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |