H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Pablo Andujar vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 2-0

Pablo Andujar holds a 2–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pablo Andujar leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Pablo Andujar won the 2013 Madrid Open third round 5-5 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pablo Andujar
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pablo Andujar #113 5-5 (ret.) Daniel Gimeno-Traver #52 Match data May 10, 2013* R16 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Pablo Andujar #69 6-3 6-1 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #58 Match data Feb 10, 2011* R32 Costa Do Sauipe ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pablo Andujar #1,102 #32 1,205 1,862 164 241 40.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pablo Andujar Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2007 3–4 42.9% #146 1,641 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2008 3–6 33.3% #101 1,603 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2009 1–12 7.7% #160 1,527 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2010 8–8 50.0% #71 1,703 0 0 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2011 25–28 47.2% #46 1,681 0 1 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2012 19–29 39.6% #42 1,647 0 2 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2013 18–31 36.7% #48 1,722 0 2 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2014 23–22 51.1% #41 1,828 0 3 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2015 16–22 42.1% #64 1,789 0 3 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2016 1–7 12.5% #432 1,639 0 3 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 2018 7–7 50.0% #82 1,659 0 4 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0
33 2019 15–18 45.5% #64 1,722 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2020 4–12 25.0% #60 1,627 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2021 12–18 40.0% #91 1,739 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2022 9–13 40.9% #121 1,622 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2023 0–4 0.0% #1102 1,519 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pablo Andujar Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
21 2007 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 2009 0 2 2 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2010 1 2 3 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 22 14 36 61.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2012 8 16 24 33.3% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 2013 6 15 21 28.6% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2014 8 12 20 40.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2015 2 9 11 18.2% 12 10 22 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2016 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 4 4 8 50.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 44 105 149 29.5% 117 118 235 49.8% 3 18 21 14.3% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 400/405 of Pablo Andujar's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pablo Andujar Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2007 7/7 0.7 1.9 66.3% 64.8% 46.3% 61.1% 30.7% 58.8% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 9/9 1.9 3.2 72.5% 63.3% 43.8% 57.9% 48.8% 57.8% 39.0% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2009 13/13 1.8 3.5 62.9% 60.3% 47.1% 45.6% 27.5% 55.0% 34.6% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2010 16/16 1.4 2.6 66.3% 63.5% 49.0% 44.1% 41.3% 58.7% 39.0% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2011 53/53 1.6 2.6 61.4% 64.9% 49.3% 54.6% 47.4% 58.9% 39.6% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2012 48/48 1.6 4.8 58.7% 63.3% 47.6% 49.6% 43.3% 57.0% 39.4% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2013 49/49 1.5 3.4 60.1% 65.2% 47.6% 60.0% 42.4% 58.1% 37.2% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2014 44/45 1.5 2.3 64.7% 64.8% 52.6% 53.6% 43.7% 60.3% 41.1% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2015 38/38 2.4 2.4 66.9% 64.8% 52.5% 56.2% 42.5% 60.4% 39.3% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2016 8/8 2.0 2.5 66.8% 65.1% 43.3% 38.1% 50.3% 58.0% 36.1% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 2018 14/14 1.1 2.1 66.5% 63.1% 50.9% 49.9% 42.9% 58.9% 43.1% 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
33 2019 32/33 1.8 3.1 65.0% 65.9% 46.8% 53.4% 38.3% 59.2% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 16/16 1.0 3.8 62.3% 65.9% 47.8% 56.9% 39.8% 59.2% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 28/30 2.2 4.5 63.7% 64.8% 45.8% 57.7% 44.1% 57.9% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 21/22 1.2 4.5 65.1% 63.6% 45.5% 54.4% 47.8% 57.4% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 4/4 0.5 4.5 63.6% 49.1% 41.5% 39.5% 41.7% 46.7% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 400/405 1.6 3.3 63.4% 64.3% 48.4% 53.8% 42.9% 58.4% 39.0% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pablo Andujar Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2006 1500 97.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2007 1641 120.5 -0.88 +0.96 0.993 49.9% — +64 — 38.5% -0.31 0–1 0–1 — -0.13 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1603 123.0 -1.80 +0.19 0.925 48.4% — +131 — 36.0% -0.60 1–1 1–4 (20%) — -0.07 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20
23 2009 1528 112.1 -4.44 -1.83 0.769 45.0% — +94 +15 21.9% -2.16 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 97.7 -0.45 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24
24 2010 1704 127.5 -2.91 -0.31 0.944 48.7% -298 +150 — 50.0% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 3–1 (75%) 101.0 +0.67 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95
25 2011 1682 142.1 -3.31 +1.86 0.963 49.5% -262 +224 -224 45.8% -0.28 7–4 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 104.8 +1.11 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72
26 2012 1648 141.7 -4.98 +1.68 0.916 48.1% -112 +167 — 42.7% -0.66 7–11 (39%) 11–7 (61%) 102.9 +2.10 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11
27 2013 1723 143.9 -4.35 +0.71 0.886 47.8% -86 +64 — 36.5% -0.90 7–10 (41%) 4–10 (29%) 95.1 +0.42 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22
28 2014 1829 154.7 -2.21 +3.99 1.033 50.6% -119 +88 — 50.0% +0.07 5–8 (38%) 1–10 (9%) 92.0 -0.85 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44
29 2015 1789 148.0 -2.34 +2.40 0.992 49.7% -168 +142 -303 46.9% -0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–7 (46%) 98.0 -1.10 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04
30 2016 1639 110.7 -2.76 -0.49 0.860 47.0% -100 +213 — 22.2% -1.78 1–1 0–2 — -0.18 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2018 1660 127.2 -1.98 +4.21 1.049 50.8% — +129 — 53.3% +0.33 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 +0.39 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 2019 1723 140.9 -4.05 +1.79 0.922 48.3% -109 +105 — 43.9% -0.55 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 106.5 -0.59 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1628 133.5 -2.24 +0.41 0.940 48.4% -53 +127 — 32.5% -0.97 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 94.2 -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1739 137.5 -4.15 +2.05 0.926 48.8% -128 +66 — 45.9% -0.36 6–8 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 100.4 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1622 128.4 -3.35 +0.90 0.912 48.5% +5 +51 — 45.5% -0.49 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 98.4 +1.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1520 95.2 -4.98 -1.21 0.672 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.17 — — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1862 143.7 -3.41 +1.63 0.938 48.7% -123 +126 -195 42.7% -0.51 51–75 (40%) 52–67 (44%) 95.7 +0.55 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.