H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Pablo Andujar vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 1-0

Pablo Andujar holds a 1–0 lead over Lukas Lacko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pablo Andujar leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pablo Andujar won the 2012 Canadian Open first round 6-2 4-6 6-2.

ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pablo Andujar #52 6-2 6-2 Lukas Lacko #74 Match data Oct 28, 2013 Q1 Q Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Pablo Andujar #44 6-2 4-6 6-2 Lukas Lacko #56 Match data Aug 8, 2012* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pablo Andujar #1,102 #32 1,205 1,862 164 241 40.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pablo Andujar Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 2007 3–4 42.9% #146 1,641 0 0 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2008 3–6 33.3% #101 1,603 0 0 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2009 1–12 7.7% #160 1,527 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2010 8–8 50.0% #71 1,703 0 0 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2011 25–28 47.2% #46 1,681 0 1 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2012 19–29 39.6% #42 1,647 0 2 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2013 18–31 36.7% #48 1,722 0 2 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2014 23–22 51.1% #41 1,828 0 3 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2015 16–22 42.1% #64 1,789 0 3 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2016 1–7 12.5% #432 1,639 0 3 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
32 2018 7–7 50.0% #82 1,659 0 4
33 2019 15–18 45.5% #64 1,722 0 4 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0
34 2020 4–12 25.0% #60 1,627 0 4
35 2021 12–18 40.0% #91 1,739 0 4
36 2022 9–13 40.9% #121 1,622 0 4
37 2023 0–4 0.0% #1102 1,519 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pablo Andujar Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2008 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2007 3 4 7 42.9% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2009 0 2 2 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2011 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2010 1 2 3 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 22 14 36 61.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2012 8 16 24 33.3% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2013 6 15 21 28.6% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2014 8 12 20 40.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2015 2 9 11 18.2% 12 10 22 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2017 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2016 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2018 6 13 19 31.6% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 2019 1 3 4 25.0%
32 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
33 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2021 1 1 2 50.0%
34 2020 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5%
35 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
36 2022 4 4 8 50.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
37 2023 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 44 105 149 29.5% 117 118 235 49.8% 3 18 21 14.3% 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 400/405 of Pablo Andujar's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pablo Andujar Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 —/— 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 —/— 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 2007 7/7 0.7 1.9 66.3% 64.8% 46.3% 61.1% 30.7% 58.8% 41.0% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2008 9/9 1.9 3.2 72.5% 63.3% 43.8% 57.9% 48.8% 57.8% 39.0% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2009 13/13 1.8 3.5 62.9% 60.3% 47.1% 45.6% 27.5% 55.0% 34.6% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2010 16/16 1.4 2.6 66.3% 63.5% 49.0% 44.1% 41.3% 58.7% 39.0% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2011 53/53 1.6 2.6 61.4% 64.9% 49.3% 54.6% 47.4% 58.9% 39.6% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2012 48/48 1.6 4.8 58.7% 63.3% 47.6% 49.6% 43.3% 57.0% 39.4% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2013 49/49 1.5 3.4 60.1% 65.2% 47.6% 60.0% 42.4% 58.1% 37.2% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2014 44/45 1.5 2.3 64.7% 64.8% 52.6% 53.6% 43.7% 60.3% 41.1% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2015 38/38 2.4 2.4 66.9% 64.8% 52.5% 56.2% 42.5% 60.4% 39.3% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2016 8/8 2.0 2.5 66.8% 65.1% 43.3% 38.1% 50.3% 58.0% 36.1% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 —/— 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
32 2018 14/14 1.1 2.1 66.5% 63.1% 50.9% 49.9% 42.9% 58.9% 43.1% —/—
33 2019 32/33 1.8 3.1 65.0% 65.9% 46.8% 53.4% 38.3% 59.2% 37.7% 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
34 2020 16/16 1.0 3.8 62.3% 65.9% 47.8% 56.9% 39.8% 59.2% 38.3% —/—
35 2021 28/30 2.2 4.5 63.7% 64.8% 45.8% 57.7% 44.1% 57.9% 39.0% —/—
36 2022 21/22 1.2 4.5 65.1% 63.6% 45.5% 54.4% 47.8% 57.4% 38.9% —/—
37 2023 4/4 0.5 4.5 63.6% 49.1% 41.5% 39.5% 41.7% 46.7% 35.8% —/—
Career 400/405 1.6 3.3 63.4% 64.3% 48.4% 53.8% 42.9% 58.4% 39.0% 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pablo Andujar Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2006 1483 98.6
19 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% 16.7% -2.67 +0.02
20 2006 1500 97.9 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% 25.0% -2.00 1–1 +0.29
21 2007 1641 120.5 -0.88 +0.96 0.993 49.9% +64 38.5% -0.31 0–1 0–1 -0.13 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) -0.10
22 2008 1603 123.0 -1.80 +0.19 0.925 48.4% +131 36.0% -0.60 1–1 1–4 (20%) -0.07 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) -0.83
23 2009 1528 112.1 -4.44 -1.83 0.769 45.0% +94 +15 21.9% -2.16 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) -0.45 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) -0.54
24 2010 1704 127.5 -2.91 -0.31 0.944 48.7% -298 +150 50.0% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 3–1 (75%) +0.67 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) -0.47
25 2011 1682 142.1 -3.31 +1.86 0.963 49.5% -262 +224 -224 45.8% -0.28 7–4 (64%) 5–8 (38%) +1.11 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) -0.64
26 2012 1648 141.7 -4.98 +1.68 0.916 48.1% -112 +167 42.7% -0.66 7–11 (39%) 11–7 (61%) +2.10 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) -0.19
27 2013 1723 143.9 -4.35 +0.71 0.886 47.8% -86 +64 36.5% -0.90 7–10 (41%) 4–10 (29%) +0.42 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) -0.16
28 2014 1829 154.7 -2.21 +3.99 1.033 50.6% -119 +88 50.0% +0.07 5–8 (38%) 1–10 (9%) -0.85 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) +0.21
29 2015 1789 148.0 -2.34 +2.40 0.992 49.7% -168 +142 -303 46.9% -0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–7 (46%) -1.10 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) +0.17
30 2016 1639 110.7 -2.76 -0.49 0.860 47.0% -100 +213 22.2% -1.78 1–1 0–2 -0.18 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) +1.00
31 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 25.0% -1.63 +0.11
32 2018 1660 127.2 -1.98 +4.21 1.049 50.8% +129 53.3% +0.33 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) +0.39 2020 1514 93.5
33 2019 1723 140.9 -4.05 +1.79 0.922 48.3% -109 +105 43.9% -0.55 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) -0.59 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 +0.09
34 2020 1628 133.5 -2.24 +0.41 0.940 48.4% -53 +127 32.5% -0.97 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) -0.16 2022 1445 93.3
35 2021 1739 137.5 -4.15 +2.05 0.926 48.8% -128 +66 45.9% -0.36 6–8 (43%) 5–5 (50%) -0.40
36 2022 1622 128.4 -3.35 +0.90 0.912 48.5% +5 +51 45.5% -0.49 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) +1.21
37 2023 1520 95.2 -4.98 -1.21 0.672 41.8% 0.0% -3.17 +0.23
Career 1862 143.7 -3.41 +1.63 0.938 48.7% -123 +126 -195 42.7% -0.51 51–75 (40%) 52–67 (44%) 95.7 +0.55 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.