H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Pablo Andujar vs Matthew Ebden H2H: 0-2
Matthew Ebden holds a 2–0 lead over Pablo Andujar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Matthew Ebden leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Matthew Ebden won the 2011 Shanghai Masters second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2011* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Matthew Ebden | 6-4 6-4 | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
| Oct 6, 2011* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Matthew Ebden | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Andujar | #1,102 | #32 | 1,205 | 1,862 | 164 | 240 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Matthew Ebden | #970 | #39 | 1,134 | 1,849 | 75 | 129 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pablo Andujar | Matthew Ebden | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #146 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #160 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #105 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #46 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #68 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #42 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 5–21 | 19.2% | #231 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 18–31 | 36.7% | #48 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #105 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #698 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #64 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #76 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #432 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #46 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #244 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,659 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #237 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2020 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #60 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #740 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #121 | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,518 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |