H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Pablo Andujar vs Tobias Kamke H2H: 1-1
Pablo Andujar and Tobias Kamke are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pablo Andujar leads 1–0 on clay, while Tobias Kamke leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pablo Andujar won the 2015 Casablanca third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2015* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Pablo Andujar | 6-3 6-4 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2011* | Bangkok | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tobias Kamke | 6-0 6-1 | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Andujar | #1,102 | #32 | 1,205 | 1,862 | 164 | 240 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Tobias Kamke | #1,114 | #64 | 744 | 1,764 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pablo Andujar | Tobias Kamke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #146 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #160 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2010 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #46 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #96 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #42 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 18–31 | 36.7% | #48 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #64 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #277 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #432 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,659 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2020 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #60 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #121 | 1,620 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,518 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |