H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Pablo Andujar vs Tobias Kamke H2H: 1-1

Pablo Andujar and Tobias Kamke are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pablo Andujar leads 1–0 on clay, while Tobias Kamke leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pablo Andujar won the 2015 Casablanca round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pablo Andujar
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Tobias Kamke
GER Age 40 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pablo Andujar #64 6-3 6-4 Tobias Kamke #114 Match data Apr 9, 2015* R32 Casablanca ATP 250 Clay
Tobias Kamke #103 6-0 6-1 Pablo Andujar #44 Match data Sep 29, 2011* R32 Bangkok ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pablo Andujar #1,102 #32 1,205 1,862 164 241 40.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Tobias Kamke #1,114 #64 744 1,766 62 101 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pablo Andujar Tobias Kamke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 2007 3–4 42.9% #146 1,641 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #210 1,502 0 0
22 2008 3–6 33.3% #101 1,603 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #243 1,508 0 0
23 2009 1–12 7.7% #160 1,527 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2010 8–8 50.0% #71 1,703 0 0 2010 7–8 46.7% #67 1,639 0 0
25 2011 25–28 47.2% #46 1,681 0 1 2011 15–23 39.5% #96 1,738 0 0
26 2012 19–29 39.6% #42 1,647 0 2 2012 6–18 25.0% #98 1,628 0 0
27 2013 18–31 36.7% #48 1,722 0 2 2013 17–21 44.7% #74 1,731 0 0
28 2014 23–22 51.1% #41 1,828 0 3 2014 9–16 36.0% #97 1,669 0 0
29 2015 16–22 42.1% #64 1,789 0 3 2015 1–5 16.7% #277 1,583 0 0
30 2016 1–7 12.5% #432 1,639 0 3 2016 5–5 50.0% #118 1,707 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2017 2–2 50.0% #233 1,617 0 0
32 2018 7–7 50.0% #82 1,659 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2019 15–18 45.5% #64 1,722 0 4 2019 0–1 0.0% #242 1,566 0 0
34 2020 4–12 25.0% #60 1,627 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2021 12–18 40.0% #91 1,739 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2022 9–13 40.9% #121 1,622 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2023 0–4 0.0% #1102 1,519 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pablo Andujar Tobias Kamke
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 2007 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2008 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2009 0 2 2 0.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 1 2 3 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2010 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 22 14 36 61.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2011 7 14 21 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
26 2012 8 16 24 33.3% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 5 11 16 31.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 2013 6 15 21 28.6% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 10 11 21 47.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2014 8 12 20 40.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 4 10 14 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2015 2 9 11 18.2% 12 10 22 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2015 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2016 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2016 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
32 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 6 10 16 37.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1 7 8 12.5% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 4 4 8 50.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 44 105 149 29.5% 117 118 235 49.8% 3 18 21 14.3% — 35 61 96 36.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 11 13 24 45.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 400/405 of Pablo Andujar's and 163/163 of Tobias Kamke's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pablo Andujar Tobias Kamke
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2007 7/7 0.7 1.9 66.3% 64.8% 46.3% 61.1% 30.7% 58.8% 41.0% 2007 1/1 0.0 6.0 47.2% 56.0% 35.7% 16.7% — 45.3% 17.6%
22 2008 9/9 1.9 3.2 72.5% 63.3% 43.8% 57.9% 48.8% 57.8% 39.0% 2008 1/1 3.0 11.0 58.3% 64.9% 45.3% 25.0% 33.3% 56.7% 30.1%
23 2009 13/13 1.8 3.5 62.9% 60.3% 47.1% 45.6% 27.5% 55.0% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 16/16 1.4 2.6 66.3% 63.5% 49.0% 44.1% 41.3% 58.7% 39.0% 2010 15/15 1.8 3.3 59.0% 65.8% 48.0% 56.5% 35.6% 58.8% 39.1%
25 2011 53/53 1.6 2.6 61.4% 64.9% 49.3% 54.6% 47.4% 58.9% 39.6% 2011 38/38 2.3 3.5 57.2% 65.9% 50.9% 55.5% 39.3% 59.5% 38.5%
26 2012 48/48 1.6 4.8 58.7% 63.3% 47.6% 49.6% 43.3% 57.0% 39.4% 2012 24/24 1.4 4.6 57.4% 61.6% 45.8% 47.2% 39.2% 54.8% 40.4%
27 2013 49/49 1.5 3.4 60.1% 65.2% 47.6% 60.0% 42.4% 58.1% 37.2% 2013 38/38 2.2 2.6 60.4% 66.9% 49.5% 60.7% 46.9% 60.0% 39.2%
28 2014 44/45 1.5 2.3 64.7% 64.8% 52.6% 53.6% 43.7% 60.3% 41.1% 2014 25/25 2.4 3.3 61.0% 66.2% 51.7% 60.8% 36.4% 60.4% 34.6%
29 2015 38/38 2.4 2.4 66.9% 64.8% 52.5% 56.2% 42.5% 60.4% 39.3% 2015 6/6 2.2 2.5 56.5% 61.9% 46.0% 38.6% 45.4% 54.5% 37.5%
30 2016 8/8 2.0 2.5 66.8% 65.1% 43.3% 38.1% 50.3% 58.0% 36.1% 2016 10/10 1.0 3.1 61.2% 64.4% 50.3% 45.7% 44.5% 58.8% 39.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 4/4 2.3 3.5 57.0% 73.4% 51.3% 60.9% 58.5% 64.2% 39.7%
32 2018 14/14 1.1 2.1 66.5% 63.1% 50.9% 49.9% 42.9% 58.9% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 32/33 1.8 3.1 65.0% 65.9% 46.8% 53.4% 38.3% 59.2% 37.7% 2019 1/1 0.0 8.0 46.4% 66.7% 44.1% 60.0% 33.3% 54.5% 29.6%
34 2020 16/16 1.0 3.8 62.3% 65.9% 47.8% 56.9% 39.8% 59.2% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 28/30 2.2 4.5 63.7% 64.8% 45.8% 57.7% 44.1% 57.9% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 21/22 1.2 4.5 65.1% 63.6% 45.5% 54.4% 47.8% 57.4% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 4/4 0.5 4.5 63.6% 49.1% 41.5% 39.5% 41.7% 46.7% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 400/405 1.6 3.3 63.4% 64.3% 48.4% 53.8% 42.9% 58.4% 39.0% — 163/163 2.0 3.4 58.8% 65.4% 49.3% 54.9% 41.0% 58.7% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pablo Andujar Tobias Kamke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2006 1500 97.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1641 120.5 -0.88 +0.96 0.993 49.9% — +64 — 38.5% -0.31 0–1 0–1 — -0.13 2007 1502 102.7 +1.52 -1.81 0.323 34.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.07
22 2008 1603 123.0 -1.80 +0.19 0.925 48.4% — +131 — 36.0% -0.60 1–1 1–4 (20%) — -0.07 2008 1509 105.8 +1.11 -1.95 0.695 44.2% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.07
23 2009 1528 112.1 -4.44 -1.83 0.769 45.0% — +94 +15 21.9% -2.16 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 97.7 -0.45 2009 1457 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 1704 127.5 -2.91 -0.31 0.944 48.7% -298 +150 — 50.0% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 3–1 (75%) 101.0 +0.67 2010 1639 126.8 -1.68 +1.56 0.949 48.8% -130 -61 +94 46.3% -0.29 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
25 2011 1682 142.1 -3.31 +1.86 0.963 49.5% -262 +224 -224 45.8% -0.28 7–4 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 104.8 +1.11 2011 1738 134.7 -2.56 +1.09 0.951 49.1% -78 -127 +18 42.4% -0.27 1–8 (11%) 3–9 (25%) 89.6 +0.04
26 2012 1648 141.7 -4.98 +1.68 0.916 48.1% -112 +167 — 42.7% -0.66 7–11 (39%) 11–7 (61%) 102.9 +2.10 2012 1629 130.3 -5.44 +2.38 0.893 47.6% -3 -69 — 33.9% -1.11 1–6 (14%) 1–4 (20%) 91.7 -0.37
27 2013 1723 143.9 -4.35 +0.71 0.886 47.8% -86 +64 — 36.5% -0.90 7–10 (41%) 4–10 (29%) 95.1 +0.42 2013 1731 143.6 -2.58 +2.05 0.978 50.0% +2 -95 -37 48.9% +0.08 4–6 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 102.2 -0.29
28 2014 1829 154.7 -2.21 +3.99 1.033 50.6% -119 +88 — 50.0% +0.07 5–8 (38%) 1–10 (9%) 92.0 -0.85 2014 1669 132.2 -3.08 -1.17 0.873 48.0% -24 -5 +60 42.6% -0.69 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 99.9 +0.69
29 2015 1789 148.0 -2.34 +2.40 0.992 49.7% -168 +142 -303 46.9% -0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–7 (46%) 98.0 -1.10 2015 1583 117.3 -3.20 +0.43 0.825 46.0% -7 — — 25.0% -1.69 1–1 1–1 — -0.03
30 2016 1639 110.7 -2.76 -0.49 0.860 47.0% -100 +213 — 22.2% -1.78 1–1 0–2 — -0.18 2016 1707 126.4 -2.95 +1.32 0.953 49.2% -8 — — 47.8% -0.17 1–0 3–3 (50%) — +0.76
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1618 113.4 +0.68 +0.45 1.108 51.9% — — +97 55.6% +0.33 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.10
32 2018 1660 127.2 -1.98 +4.21 1.049 50.8% — +129 — 53.3% +0.33 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 +0.39 2018 1543 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1723 140.9 -4.05 +1.79 0.922 48.3% -109 +105 — 43.9% -0.55 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 106.5 -0.59 2019 1567 110.3 -0.77 -0.97 0.651 42.8% — — — 25.0% -2.25 — — — -0.04
34 2020 1628 133.5 -2.24 +0.41 0.940 48.4% -53 +127 — 32.5% -0.97 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 94.2 -0.16 2020 1532 92.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1739 137.5 -4.15 +2.05 0.926 48.8% -128 +66 — 45.9% -0.36 6–8 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 100.4 -0.40 2021 1492 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1622 128.4 -3.35 +0.90 0.912 48.5% +5 +51 — 45.5% -0.49 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 98.4 +1.21 2022 1515 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1520 95.2 -4.98 -1.21 0.672 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.17 — — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1862 143.7 -3.41 +1.63 0.938 48.7% -123 +126 -195 42.7% -0.51 51–75 (40%) 52–67 (44%) 95.7 +0.55 — 1766 131.0 -2.90 +1.13 0.926 48.7% -32 -76 +38 42.4% -0.48 12–30 (29%) 21–28 (43%) 91.3 +0.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.