H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Pablo Carreno Busta vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 1-0
Pablo Carreno Busta holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pablo Carreno Busta leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pablo Carreno Busta won the 2016 Sao Paulo fourth round 6-2 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Spain
Age 35
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2016* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Pablo Carreno Busta | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Carreno Busta | #65 | #10 | 3,325 | 2,047 | 277 | 232 | 54.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| Daniel Gimeno-Traver | #1,222 | #48 | 998 | 1,809 | 95 | 169 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pablo Carreno Busta | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #267 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #51 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #67 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #72 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #30 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #10 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 8–23 | 25.8% | #107 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,867 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #70 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,963 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #77 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #16 | 2,020 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #112 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #20 | 1,906 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #13 | 1,920 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #115 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #606 | 1,852 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #196 | 1,762 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2025 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #93 | 1,675 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #65 | 1,768 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |