H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Pablo Carreno Busta vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 1-0

Pablo Carreno Busta holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pablo Carreno Busta leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pablo Carreno Busta won the 2016 Sao Paulo round of 16 6-2 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pablo Carreno Busta
Spain Age 35 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pablo Carreno Busta #67 6-2 3-6 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #99 Match data Feb 26, 2016* R16 Sao Paulo ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pablo Carreno Busta #66 #10 3,325 2,069 284 239 54.3% 0 1 0 1 5 7
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pablo Carreno Busta Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #136 1,494 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2013 7–7 50.0% #64 1,716 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2014 14–25 35.9% #51 1,733 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2015 14–25 35.9% #67 1,715 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2016 40–26 60.6% #30 1,962 0 2 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2017 36–24 60.0% #10 1,884 0 3 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2018 31–21 59.6% #23 1,867 0 3 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2019 30–21 58.8% #27 1,962 0 4 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2020 20–12 62.5% #16 2,020 0 4 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2021 35–17 67.3% #20 1,942 0 6 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2022 33–23 58.9% #13 1,923 0 7 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2023 1–3 25.0% #606 1,855 0 7 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 2024 7–8 46.7% #196 1,762 0 7 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0
33 2025 6–11 35.3% #93 1,674 0 7 — — — — — — —
34 2026 10–15 40.0% #66 1,708 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pablo Carreno Busta Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
21 2013 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 4 9 13 30.8% 10 15 25 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 2015 6 11 17 35.3% 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2016 20 12 32 62.5% 20 12 32 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2017 16 15 31 51.6% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2018 17 10 27 63.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 2019 23 10 33 69.7% 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2020 16 10 26 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2021 16 10 26 61.5% 17 5 22 77.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2022 20 11 31 64.5% 11 9 20 55.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 2023 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2024 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2025 4 6 10 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 3 9 12 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 155 125 280 55.4% 122 99 221 55.2% 7 15 22 31.8% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 514/523 of Pablo Carreno Busta's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pablo Carreno Busta Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 2011 1/1 2.0 3.0 60.0% 63.3% 42.5% 36.4% 50.0% 55.0% 37.7% 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2013 14/14 2.8 1.6 58.1% 65.7% 47.2% 44.2% 44.7% 57.9% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 38/39 3.2 2.1 60.4% 68.7% 49.6% 50.7% 44.8% 61.3% 36.3% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2015 39/39 5.3 1.9 60.4% 69.8% 51.7% 64.2% 39.2% 62.7% 37.5% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2016 66/66 4.5 1.8 61.6% 71.4% 51.7% 55.2% 49.4% 63.9% 39.6% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2017 59/60 3.5 1.7 67.9% 67.6% 52.2% 56.4% 47.4% 62.5% 38.8% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2018 52/52 3.6 2.0 66.3% 67.9% 54.0% 59.1% 48.2% 63.2% 39.3% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2019 51/51 4.6 1.9 67.3% 71.7% 53.4% 67.8% 36.7% 65.2% 37.0% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2020 32/32 4.9 1.6 67.4% 70.6% 50.9% 62.4% 40.8% 64.2% 37.1% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2021 45/52 3.8 1.6 69.1% 71.3% 54.4% 69.8% 44.9% 66.2% 36.9% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2022 56/56 4.0 1.9 66.5% 70.6% 58.3% 61.6% 44.2% 66.4% 38.2% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2023 4/4 11.8 4.0 62.9% 74.5% 54.2% 72.0% 29.0% 67.0% 32.8% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 2024 15/15 3.5 2.9 62.4% 69.5% 51.4% 61.2% 50.3% 62.3% 38.8% 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
33 2025 17/17 2.8 2.0 63.0% 70.5% 53.8% 56.1% 35.3% 64.3% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 25/25 3.6 2.3 68.6% 67.4% 50.0% 48.6% 36.6% 62.6% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 514/523 4.0 1.9 65.1% 69.7% 52.8% 59.4% 43.8% 63.7% 37.9% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pablo Carreno Busta Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2010 1492 101.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 2011 1495 106.2 -0.92 -2.69 0.839 46.1% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.07 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2012 1505 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2013 1717 139.7 -2.68 +0.19 0.895 48.1% -134 +77 — 42.4% -0.61 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.9 -0.69 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 1734 137.2 -1.71 +0.06 0.938 48.8% -109 -30 — 39.8% -0.68 3–10 (23%) 6–6 (50%) 93.3 -0.95 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20
23 2015 1716 143.8 -1.50 +0.90 1.005 50.2% -44 -36 — 44.4% -0.08 2–12 (14%) 6–11 (35%) 88.3 +0.49 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24
24 2016 1962 163.1 +0.91 +2.75 1.096 51.6% -42 -66 — 57.2% +0.42 10–8 (56%) 16–16 (50%) 104.7 -1.57 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95
25 2017 1885 157.3 -0.66 +2.34 1.035 50.8% -62 +128 — 60.1% +0.50 9–8 (53%) 16–5 (76%) 105.9 +2.92 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72
26 2018 1868 152.8 -0.32 +2.97 1.067 51.4% +19 +63 — 54.8% +0.32 10–5 (67%) 12–13 (48%) 101.4 +2.48 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11
27 2019 1962 152.8 +1.20 +1.25 1.063 51.0% +23 -129 -426 58.9% +0.64 10–10 (50%) 14–20 (41%) 92.2 -0.03 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22
28 2020 2020 159.2 +1.94 +1.20 1.037 50.8% -19 -109 — 58.4% +0.36 5–4 (56%) 6–4 (60%) 99.0 -1.05 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44
29 2021 1943 159.5 +3.08 +0.51 1.091 51.5% -7 +139 -371 65.9% +0.69 8–7 (53%) 14–6 (70%) 103.8 -0.46 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04
30 2022 1924 160.0 +2.91 +1.80 1.139 52.0% +34 +47 -365 57.5% +0.66 10–12 (45%) 12–11 (52%) 97.1 +1.16 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22
31 2023 1855 114.1 +0.78 -1.56 0.995 50.6% +22 — — 50.0% +0.14 0–3 (0%) 2–3 (40%) 93.8 +0.26 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2024 1762 135.5 -0.77 +1.54 1.027 51.0% +45 — — 48.6% -0.03 2–2 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 +0.39 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 2025 1675 126.5 -0.12 -0.26 0.990 49.6% +52 +118 — 43.5% -0.37 1–4 (20%) 4–3 (57%) 95.3 -0.58 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 1708 134.2 -0.96 +0.50 0.978 49.5% -14 +87 — 46.5% -0.30 2–7 (22%) 5–4 (56%) 93.7 -1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2069 158.1 +0.45 +1.48 1.044 50.8% -12 +26 -386 54.4% +0.26 76–95 (44%) 118–108 (52%) 94.2 +0.24 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.