H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Pablo Carreno Busta vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 2-4

Jeremy Chardy holds a 4–2 lead over Pablo Carreno Busta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jeremy Chardy leads 3–0 on clay, while Pablo Carreno Busta leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Pablo Carreno Busta won the 2020 Adelaide International second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pablo Carreno Busta
Spain Age 35 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main-draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pablo Carreno Busta #30 6-3 6-2 Jeremy Chardy #56 Match data Jan 16, 2020* R16 Adelaide International ATP 250 Hard
Jeremy Chardy #80 6-4 4-6 7-5 Pablo Carreno Busta #53 Match data Jul 18, 2019* R32 Swedish Open ATP 250 Clay
Jeremy Chardy #42 5-7 6-1 6-2 Pablo Carreno Busta #38 Match data May 2, 2019* R32 Estoril Open ATP 250 Clay
Pablo Carreno Busta #55 6-4 7-6(6) Jeremy Chardy #39 Match data Aug 10, 2016* R32 Los Cabos Open ATP 250 Hard
Jeremy Chardy #34 6-1 6-2 Pablo Carreno Busta #63 Match data Oct 25, 2014* QF Valencia ATP 500 Hard
Jeremy Chardy #44 6-3 7-6(5) Pablo Carreno Busta #65 Match data Feb 7, 2014* R16 Chile Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pablo Carreno Busta #66 #10 3,325 2,069 284 239 54.3% 0 1 0 1 5 7
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pablo Carreno Busta Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #136 1,494 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2013 7–7 50.0% #64 1,716 0 0 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0
22 2014 14–25 35.9% #51 1,733 0 0 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1
23 2015 14–25 35.9% #67 1,715 0 0 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1
24 2016 40–26 60.6% #30 1,962 0 2 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1
25 2017 36–24 60.0% #10 1,884 0 3 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1
26 2018 31–21 59.6% #23 1,867 0 3 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1
27 2019 30–21 58.8% #27 1,962 0 4 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2020 20–12 62.5% #16 2,020 0 4 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1
29 2021 35–17 67.3% #20 1,942 0 6 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2022 33–23 58.9% #13 1,923 0 7 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1
31 2023 1–3 25.0% #606 1,855 0 7 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2024 7–8 46.7% #196 1,762 0 7 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1
33 2025 6–11 35.3% #93 1,674 0 7 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2026 10–15 40.0% #66 1,708 0 7 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pablo Carreno Busta Jeremy Chardy
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2013 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2014 4 9 13 30.8% 10 15 25 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2015 6 11 17 35.3% 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2016 20 12 32 62.5% 20 12 32 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2017 16 15 31 51.6% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2018 17 10 27 63.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7%
27 2019 23 10 33 69.7% 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2020 16 10 26 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2021 16 10 26 61.5% 17 5 22 77.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2022 20 11 31 64.5% 11 9 20 55.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 2023 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0%
32 2024 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
33 2025 4 6 10 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 2026 3 9 12 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 155 125 280 55.4% 122 99 221 55.2% 7 15 22 31.8% — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 514/523 of Pablo Carreno Busta's and 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pablo Carreno Busta Jeremy Chardy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2011 1/1 2.0 3.0 60.0% 63.3% 42.5% 36.4% 50.0% 55.0% 37.7% 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3%
21 2013 14/14 2.8 1.6 58.1% 65.7% 47.2% 44.2% 44.7% 57.9% 37.7% 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6%
22 2014 38/39 3.2 2.1 60.4% 68.7% 49.6% 50.7% 44.8% 61.3% 36.3% 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5%
23 2015 39/39 5.3 1.9 60.4% 69.8% 51.7% 64.2% 39.2% 62.7% 37.5% 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9%
24 2016 66/66 4.5 1.8 61.6% 71.4% 51.7% 55.2% 49.4% 63.9% 39.6% 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1%
25 2017 59/60 3.5 1.7 67.9% 67.6% 52.2% 56.4% 47.4% 62.5% 38.8% 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0%
26 2018 52/52 3.6 2.0 66.3% 67.9% 54.0% 59.1% 48.2% 63.2% 39.3% 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8%
27 2019 51/51 4.6 1.9 67.3% 71.7% 53.4% 67.8% 36.7% 65.2% 37.0% 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5%
28 2020 32/32 4.9 1.6 67.4% 70.6% 50.9% 62.4% 40.8% 64.2% 37.1% 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6%
29 2021 45/52 3.8 1.6 69.1% 71.3% 54.4% 69.8% 44.9% 66.2% 36.9% 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8%
30 2022 56/56 4.0 1.9 66.5% 70.6% 58.3% 61.6% 44.2% 66.4% 38.2% 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1%
31 2023 4/4 11.8 4.0 62.9% 74.5% 54.2% 72.0% 29.0% 67.0% 32.8% 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3%
32 2024 15/15 3.5 2.9 62.4% 69.5% 51.4% 61.2% 50.3% 62.3% 38.8% 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6%
33 2025 17/17 2.8 2.0 63.0% 70.5% 53.8% 56.1% 35.3% 64.3% 35.4% 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3%
34 2026 25/25 3.6 2.3 68.6% 67.4% 50.0% 48.6% 36.6% 62.6% 36.5% 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9%
Career — 514/523 4.0 1.9 65.1% 69.7% 52.8% 59.4% 43.8% 63.7% 37.9% — 591/597 8.0 4.2 60.3% 74.0% 49.8% 60.0% 39.6% 64.4% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pablo Carreno Busta Jeremy Chardy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2010 1492 101.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 1495 106.2 -0.92 -2.69 0.839 46.1% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.07 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22
20 2012 1505 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03
21 2013 1717 139.7 -2.68 +0.19 0.895 48.1% -134 +77 — 42.4% -0.61 4–2 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 105.9 -0.69 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) 104.0 -0.36
22 2014 1734 137.2 -1.71 +0.06 0.938 48.8% -109 -30 — 39.8% -0.68 3–10 (23%) 6–6 (50%) 93.3 -0.95 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) 108.8 -2.59
23 2015 1716 143.8 -1.50 +0.90 1.005 50.2% -44 -36 — 44.4% -0.08 2–12 (14%) 6–11 (35%) 88.3 +0.49 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) 105.6 -2.43
24 2016 1962 163.1 +0.91 +2.75 1.096 51.6% -42 -66 — 57.2% +0.42 10–8 (56%) 16–16 (50%) 104.7 -1.57 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) 93.3 -0.53
25 2017 1885 157.3 -0.66 +2.34 1.035 50.8% -62 +128 — 60.1% +0.50 9–8 (53%) 16–5 (76%) 105.9 +2.92 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 101.5 +1.81
26 2018 1868 152.8 -0.32 +2.97 1.067 51.4% +19 +63 — 54.8% +0.32 10–5 (67%) 12–13 (48%) 101.4 +2.48 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 99.8 +2.11
27 2019 1962 152.8 +1.20 +1.25 1.063 51.0% +23 -129 -426 58.9% +0.64 10–10 (50%) 14–20 (41%) 92.2 -0.03 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) 102.1 +0.64
28 2020 2020 159.2 +1.94 +1.20 1.037 50.8% -19 -109 — 58.4% +0.36 5–4 (56%) 6–4 (60%) 99.0 -1.05 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) 97.1 -0.92
29 2021 1943 159.5 +3.08 +0.51 1.091 51.5% -7 +139 -371 65.9% +0.69 8–7 (53%) 14–6 (70%) 103.8 -0.46 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) 91.1 +2.28
30 2022 1924 160.0 +2.91 +1.80 1.139 52.0% +34 +47 -365 57.5% +0.66 10–12 (45%) 12–11 (52%) 97.1 +1.16 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 100.7 -1.26
31 2023 1855 114.1 +0.78 -1.56 0.995 50.6% +22 — — 50.0% +0.14 0–3 (0%) 2–3 (40%) 93.8 +0.26 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) 106.3 -1.20
32 2024 1762 135.5 -0.77 +1.54 1.027 51.0% +45 — — 48.6% -0.03 2–2 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 +0.39 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) 98.6 -2.48
33 2025 1675 126.5 -0.12 -0.26 0.990 49.6% +52 +118 — 43.5% -0.37 1–4 (20%) 4–3 (57%) 95.3 -0.58 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08
34 2026 1708 134.2 -0.96 +0.50 0.978 49.5% -14 +87 — 46.5% -0.30 2–7 (22%) 5–4 (56%) 93.7 -1.17 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) 106.9 -2.92
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32
Career — 2069 158.1 +0.45 +1.48 1.044 50.8% -12 +26 -386 54.4% +0.26 76–95 (44%) 118–108 (52%) 94.2 +0.24 — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.