H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Pablo Cuevas vs Carlos Berlocq H2H: 1-1
Pablo Cuevas and Carlos Berlocq are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pablo Cuevas leads 1–0 on clay, while Carlos Berlocq leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carlos Berlocq won the 2013 Tokyo third round 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2013* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Carlos Berlocq | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
| Sep 24, 2010* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Pablo Cuevas | 6-4 6-0 | Carlos Berlocq | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Carlos Berlocq | #505 | #37 | 1,086 | 1,853 | 127 | 186 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pablo Cuevas | Carlos Berlocq | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #79 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #132 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #85 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #157 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #60 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #66 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #41 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #112 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #139 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,504 | 0 | 2 |