H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Pablo Cuevas vs Daniel Koellerer H2H: 0-1
Daniel Koellerer holds a 1–0 lead over Pablo Cuevas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Koellerer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Koellerer won the 2009 US Open second round 3-6 6-2 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2009* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Daniel Koellerer | 3-6 6-2 6-1 6-4 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2009* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | Q3 | Clay | Pablo Cuevas | 1-6 6-4 7-5 | Daniel Koellerer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Daniel Koellerer | #385 | #55 | 904 | 1,653 | 19 | 34 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Pablo Cuevas | Daniel Koellerer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #205 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #272 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |