H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Pablo Cuevas vs Di Wu H2H: 0-1
Di Wu holds a 1–0 lead over Pablo Cuevas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Di Wu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Di Wu won the 2016 Shanghai Masters second round 6-3 4-6 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2019 | Beijing | ATP 500 | Q1 | Hard | Pablo Cuevas | 6-1 6-4 | Di Wu | Match data |
| Oct 11, 2016* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Di Wu | 6-3 4-6 7-6(2) | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Di Wu | #1,143 | #140 | 409 | 1,555 | 4 | 20 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Pablo Cuevas | Di Wu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #408 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #295 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #244 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |