H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Pablo Cuevas vs Di Wu H2H: 0-1

Di Wu holds a 1–0 lead over Pablo Cuevas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Di Wu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Di Wu won the 2016 Shanghai Masters first round 6-3 4-6 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pablo Cuevas
URU Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Di Wu
CHN Age 34 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pablo Cuevas #47 6-1 6-4 Di Wu #296 Match data Sep 30, 2019 Q1 Q China Open ATP 500 Hard
Di Wu #182 6-3 4-6 7-6(2) Pablo Cuevas #22 Match data Oct 11, 2016* R64 Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pablo Cuevas #841 #19 1,865 1,960 212 213 49.9% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Di Wu #1,143 #140 409 1,554 4 20 16.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pablo Cuevas Di Wu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #408 1,465 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #421 1,458 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2012 0–2 0.0% #183 1,445 0 0
21 2007 0–1 0.0% #113 1,551 0 0 2013 0–3 0.0% #208 1,475 0 0
22 2008 8–13 38.1% #142 1,633 0 0 2014 0–2 0.0% #295 1,483 0 0
23 2009 18–15 54.5% #50 1,745 0 0 2015 0–3 0.0% #237 1,474 0 0
24 2010 20–22 47.6% #63 1,760 0 0 2016 2–3 40.0% #159 1,531 0 0
25 2011 11–13 45.8% #142 1,743 0 0 2017 1–3 25.0% #244 1,511 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #307 1,501 0 0
27 2013 2–4 33.3% #220 1,716 0 0 2019 1–1 50.0% #317 1,510 0 0
28 2014 17–12 58.6% #30 1,843 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2015 28–25 52.8% #40 1,815 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2016 34–23 59.6% #22 1,810 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2017 20–21 48.8% #32 1,787 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2018 13–14 48.1% #88 1,766 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 2019 22–23 48.9% #45 1,741 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 2020 7–10 41.2% #67 1,691 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2021 9–11 45.0% #97 1,651 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2022 3–6 33.3% #269 1,654 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pablo Cuevas Di Wu
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2010 8 9 17 47.1% 12 13 25 48.0% — — — — 2016 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — 2017 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2014 4 5 9 44.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 8 13 21 38.1% 19 9 28 67.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 9 13 22 40.9% 21 8 29 72.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 6 11 17 35.3% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 4 3 7 57.1% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 18 12 30 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 3 3 6 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 56 86 142 39.4% 149 116 265 56.2% 7 11 18 38.9% — 4 20 24 16.7% — — — — — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 421/425 of Pablo Cuevas's and 24/24 of Di Wu's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pablo Cuevas Di Wu
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 1.0 2.0 58.6% 58.8% 33.3% 0.0% 100.0% 48.3% 30.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 1/1 0.0 1.0 63.6% 39.3% 31.3% 33.3% 100.0% 36.4% 27.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 2/2 0.0 2.5 55.5% 52.1% 40.8% 50.5% 41.7% 47.3% 31.4%
21 2007 1/1 1.0 5.0 43.6% 50.0% 40.9% 58.8% 14.3% 44.9% 34.6% 2013 3/3 3.0 4.7 57.3% 70.2% 47.9% 70.0% 45.8% 60.7% 29.8%
22 2008 21/21 4.1 1.9 59.3% 63.2% 54.4% 55.2% 37.5% 59.5% 35.1% 2014 2/2 2.0 3.5 57.0% 58.5% 53.9% 41.8% 7.7% 56.5% 31.6%
23 2009 33/33 7.5 2.2 63.6% 72.0% 51.8% 60.2% 47.4% 64.8% 34.6% 2015 3/3 1.0 2.3 48.9% 48.6% 39.7% 42.9% 38.9% 45.0% 37.8%
24 2010 41/42 4.7 2.2 61.6% 68.2% 47.5% 50.4% 40.6% 60.3% 37.2% 2016 5/5 2.0 1.6 64.1% 61.6% 44.4% 48.0% 53.5% 55.1% 38.5%
25 2011 24/24 5.4 1.7 59.8% 72.3% 56.0% 58.0% 41.2% 65.9% 37.8% 2017 4/4 3.3 1.5 61.3% 65.2% 53.5% 56.4% 42.9% 58.9% 24.9%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/1 3.0 2.0 40.4% 76.2% 32.3% 42.9% 0.0% 50.0% 30.0%
27 2013 6/6 5.8 4.0 57.6% 69.0% 46.5% 67.5% 32.5% 59.5% 31.7% 2019 2/2 4.5 1.0 62.2% 57.6% 45.3% 64.7% 53.3% 52.7% 36.5%
28 2014 29/29 5.7 3.1 60.1% 72.0% 52.7% 47.6% 37.7% 64.2% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 53/53 5.8 2.8 60.5% 71.4% 52.5% 64.8% 42.6% 63.7% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 55/57 7.6 2.9 60.3% 75.8% 55.2% 62.3% 42.7% 67.5% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 41/41 5.3 3.6 59.0% 72.6% 51.0% 59.7% 42.4% 63.7% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 27/27 6.2 3.3 60.2% 74.3% 55.2% 57.1% 37.9% 66.4% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 45/45 5.5 3.0 58.9% 74.2% 52.7% 54.8% 44.8% 65.5% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 17/17 5.9 3.5 60.3% 70.5% 49.4% 60.5% 33.6% 62.2% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 20/20 4.8 2.5 68.9% 70.3% 50.2% 58.6% 43.1% 63.8% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 8/9 2.8 1.9 66.8% 67.4% 53.2% 60.2% 47.2% 63.3% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 421/425 5.8 2.8 60.8% 71.7% 52.3% 58.1% 41.6% 64.1% 36.6% — 24/24 2.2 2.3 58.2% 59.8% 44.8% 49.8% 45.8% 53.2% 32.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pablo Cuevas Di Wu
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1491 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1466 100.0 -2.37 -1.10 0.588 40.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.07
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1458 102.4 -1.36 +2.51 0.429 32.5% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.06
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1445 104.6 -0.95 -2.19 0.595 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — +0.20
21 2007 1551 110.8 +3.13 +0.76 0.628 39.7% — — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.20 2013 1476 118.9 -1.63 +1.54 0.759 46.0% +10 — — 22.2% -1.56 0–1 0–1 — -0.09
22 2008 1633 124.3 -1.73 -1.88 0.867 47.8% +1 -44 — 37.5% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.48 2014 1484 103.2 -3.81 +0.41 0.726 44.5% — — — 0.0% -2.40 — 0–1 — +0.15
23 2009 1745 137.5 +0.89 -2.33 0.983 50.1% -71 +96 — 55.4% +0.08 6–6 (50%) 7–2 (78%) — +1.03 2015 1474 117.7 -1.37 +2.38 0.686 42.0% +3 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.09
24 2010 1761 136.7 -1.96 -0.08 0.937 48.6% -45 +38 — 48.9% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 15–2 (88%) — +0.76 2016 1531 114.9 -2.66 +0.73 0.859 47.2% +28 — — 33.3% -1.08 1–0 1–0 — +0.19
25 2011 1743 138.9 +2.31 +0.26 1.110 51.3% -28 +9 — 52.6% +0.12 2–7 (22%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.08 2017 1511 105.9 -2.04 -2.27 0.607 43.2% +47 — — 25.0% -2.13 — 1–0 — +0.02
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1502 106.7 -0.32 +0.28 0.600 40.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.02
27 2013 1717 114.3 -1.40 -3.04 0.783 46.7% -23 — — 43.8% -1.13 1–1 1–1 — +0.05 2019 1511 117.4 -2.14 +0.20 0.772 47.0% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — +0.07
28 2014 1843 147.6 +0.35 +2.31 1.103 51.7% -117 +98 — 54.7% +0.27 7–6 (54%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 1815 156.3 +0.03 +1.37 1.032 50.7% -98 +211 -198 50.7% +0.06 9–11 (45%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1810 152.1 +3.77 +0.09 1.125 51.7% -111 +203 -133 57.5% +0.44 12–10 (55%) 19–20 (49%) — +2.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1788 154.1 +0.80 -0.10 0.998 49.9% -91 +130 — 47.6% -0.14 9–7 (56%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1767 142.3 +1.63 +0.47 1.090 51.2% -24 +67 — 47.0% +0.24 4–4 (50%) 6–14 (30%) — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1741 144.0 +1.27 -0.02 1.050 50.6% -34 +106 -89 49.1% +0.03 7–8 (47%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1692 131.9 -0.42 -0.37 0.941 48.8% -54 +121 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1652 127.3 +0.69 -1.10 0.984 49.6% -2 +108 — 45.1% -0.25 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1654 112.6 +0.30 -1.95 1.017 50.8% — +63 — 41.7% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1612 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1580 89.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1960 148.4 +0.77 -0.05 1.019 50.3% -70 +102 -143 49.9% -0.03 68–74 (48%) 100–95 (51%) 98.5 +1.59 — 1554 118.4 -2.01 +0.20 0.696 43.7% +24 — — 19.6% -2.05 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 102.3 +1.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.