H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC

Pablo Cuevas vs Gilles Muller H2H: 1-1

Pablo Cuevas and Gilles Muller are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pablo Cuevas leads 1–0 on grass, while Gilles Muller leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gilles Muller won the 2017 Sydney quarterfinal 7-6(5) 6-4.

URU Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 14, 2017* Sydney ATP 250 QF Hard Gilles Muller #34 7-6(5) 6-4 Pablo Cuevas #22 Match data
Jun 24, 2016* Nottingham ATP 250 SF Grass Pablo Cuevas #25 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 Gilles Muller #41 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pablo Cuevas #841 #19 1,865 1,960 211 212 49.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,071 200 199 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pablo Cuevas Gilles Muller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0
21 2007 0–1 0.0% #113 1,551 0 0 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,599 0 0
22 2008 8–13 38.1% #142 1,631 0 0 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,727 0 0
23 2009 18–15 54.5% #50 1,744 0 0 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,535 0 0
24 2010 20–22 47.6% #63 1,760 0 0 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,578 0 0
25 2011 11–13 45.8% #142 1,743 0 0 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,675 0 0
26 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,634 0 0
27 2013 2–4 33.3% #220 1,718 0 0 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,612 0 0
28 2014 17–12 58.6% #30 1,842 0 2 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0
29 2015 28–25 52.8% #40 1,815 0 3 2012 20–20 50.0% #67 1,834 0 0
30 2016 33–22 60.0% #22 1,818 0 5 2013 2–7 22.2% #368 1,691 0 0
31 2017 20–21 48.8% #32 1,788 0 6 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,743 0 0
32 2018 13–14 48.1% #88 1,766 0 6 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0
33 2019 22–23 48.9% #45 1,740 0 6 2016 33–23 58.9% #34 1,956 0 0
34 2020 7–10 41.2% #67 1,691 0 6 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,939 0 2
35 2021 9–11 45.0% #97 1,651 0 6 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,687 0 2
36 2022 3–6 33.3% #269 1,654 0 6