H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Pablo Cuevas vs Jose Acasuso H2H: 1-2
Jose Acasuso holds a 2–1 lead over Pablo Cuevas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jose Acasuso leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Jose Acasuso won the 2011 Buenos Aires fourth round 6-7(2) 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2011* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 6-7(2) 7-5 6-1 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2009* | Costa Do Sauipe | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 6-3 6-2 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
| Feb 2, 2008* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Pablo Cuevas | 6-3 6-3 | Jose Acasuso | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Jose Acasuso | #1,107 | #20 | 1,640 | 1,830 | 181 | 178 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pablo Cuevas | Jose Acasuso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #101 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #67 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #253 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #255 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |