H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Pablo Cuevas vs Leonardo Mayer H2H: 2-1
Pablo Cuevas holds a 2–1 lead over Leonardo Mayer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Pablo Cuevas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pablo Cuevas won the 2018 Sao Paulo quarterfinal 6-2 6-7(13) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2018* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Pablo Cuevas | 6-2 6-7(13) 7-6(5) | Leonardo Mayer | Match data |
| Oct 29, 2014* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Pablo Cuevas | 7-6(3) 1-0 (ret.) | Leonardo Mayer | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2010* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Leonardo Mayer | 6-4 6-2 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Leonardo Mayer | #748 | #21 | 1,605 | 1,937 | 166 | 194 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pablo Cuevas | Leonardo Mayer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #78 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #139 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #52 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #92 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 | 2020 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,520 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |