H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Pablo Cuevas vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 1-1
Pablo Cuevas and Lukasz Kubot are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2011 Rome Masters second round 7-6(1) 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2011* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Lukasz Kubot | 7-6(1) 2-6 6-2 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2011* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Pablo Cuevas | 5-7 7-5 6-3 | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Pablo Cuevas | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |