H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Pablo Cuevas vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 1-2
Radek Stepanek holds a 2–1 lead over Pablo Cuevas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Radek Stepanek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2014 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Radek Stepanek | 6-2 6-4 6-4 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
| Oct 23, 2010* | Moscow | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Pablo Cuevas | 6-4 7-6(3) | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Aug 24, 2010* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Radek Stepanek | 6-0 6-4 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pablo Cuevas | Radek Stepanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 |