H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Pablo Cuevas vs Sam Groth H2H: 1-0

Pablo Cuevas holds a 1–0 lead over Sam Groth in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pablo Cuevas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Pablo Cuevas won the 2015 Roland Garros first round 6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pablo Cuevas
URU Age 40 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Sam Groth
AUS Age 38 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pablo Cuevas #23 6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 6-3 Sam Groth #72 Match data May 26, 2015* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Pablo Cuevas #132 7-6(12) 7-5 Sam Groth #231 Match data Aug 10, 2008 Q2 Q Washington Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pablo Cuevas #841 #19 1,865 1,960 212 213 49.9% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Sam Groth #1,155 #53 843 1,849 36 58 38.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pablo Cuevas Sam Groth
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2008 1–1 50.0% #278 1,556 0 0
21 2007 0–1 0.0% #113 1,551 0 0 2009 1–2 33.3% #279 1,548 0 0
22 2008 8–13 38.1% #142 1,633 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2009 18–15 54.5% #50 1,745 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2010 20–22 47.6% #63 1,760 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2011 11–13 45.8% #142 1,743 0 0 2013 1–3 25.0% #172 1,553 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2014 9–13 40.9% #81 1,707 0 0
27 2013 2–4 33.3% #220 1,716 0 0 2015 18–21 46.2% #60 1,796 0 0
28 2014 17–12 58.6% #30 1,843 0 2 2016 4–15 21.1% #180 1,636 0 0
29 2015 28–25 52.8% #40 1,815 0 3 2017 2–3 40.0% #248 1,594 0 0
30 2016 34–23 59.6% #22 1,810 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 2017 20–21 48.8% #32 1,787 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2018 13–14 48.1% #88 1,766 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 2019 22–23 48.9% #45 1,741 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 2020 7–10 41.2% #67 1,691 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 2021 9–11 45.0% #97 1,651 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 2022 3–6 33.3% #269 1,654 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pablo Cuevas Sam Groth
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2008 1 2 3 33.3% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 8 9 17 47.1% 12 13 25 48.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 8 9 17 47.1% — — — — 2013 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 6 11 17 35.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
27 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 12 15 27 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 2014 4 5 9 44.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 2 11 13 15.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2015 8 13 21 38.1% 19 9 28 67.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2017 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2016 9 13 22 40.9% 21 8 29 72.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 6 11 17 35.3% 14 10 24 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 4 3 7 57.1% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 18 12 30 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 3 3 6 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 56 86 142 39.4% 149 116 265 56.2% 7 11 18 38.9% — 22 42 64 34.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 13 12 25 52.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 421/425 of Pablo Cuevas's and 93/94 of Sam Groth's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pablo Cuevas Sam Groth
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 19.0 6.0 54.6% 87.5% 56.2% 78.6% 37.5% 72.7% 33.2%
21 2007 1/1 1.0 5.0 43.6% 50.0% 40.9% 58.8% 14.3% 44.9% 34.6% 2009 3/3 10.3 8.3 49.4% 71.0% 48.2% 60.8% 100.0% 59.3% 28.8%
22 2008 21/21 4.1 1.9 59.3% 63.2% 54.4% 55.2% 37.5% 59.5% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 33/33 7.5 2.2 63.6% 72.0% 51.8% 60.2% 47.4% 64.8% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 41/42 4.7 2.2 61.6% 68.2% 47.5% 50.4% 40.6% 60.3% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 24/24 5.4 1.7 59.8% 72.3% 56.0% 58.0% 41.2% 65.9% 37.8% 2013 4/4 15.5 5.0 64.1% 72.9% 54.7% 64.2% 24.1% 65.9% 32.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 22/22 15.6 4.2 61.8% 81.6% 54.3% 67.8% 30.8% 71.1% 28.8%
27 2013 6/6 5.8 4.0 57.6% 69.0% 46.5% 67.5% 32.5% 59.5% 31.7% 2015 39/39 16.0 4.6 61.6% 78.8% 51.4% 66.5% 26.3% 68.1% 28.5%
28 2014 29/29 5.7 3.1 60.1% 72.0% 52.7% 47.6% 37.7% 64.2% 39.5% 2016 18/19 14.8 5.8 58.0% 77.3% 46.6% 63.5% 44.8% 64.2% 29.4%
29 2015 53/53 5.8 2.8 60.5% 71.4% 52.5% 64.8% 42.6% 63.7% 37.5% 2017 5/5 15.8 6.4 56.3% 79.2% 48.1% 67.4% 39.9% 65.9% 26.2%
30 2016 55/57 7.6 2.9 60.3% 75.8% 55.2% 62.3% 42.7% 67.5% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 41/41 5.3 3.6 59.0% 72.6% 51.0% 59.7% 42.4% 63.7% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 27/27 6.2 3.3 60.2% 74.3% 55.2% 57.1% 37.9% 66.4% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 45/45 5.5 3.0 58.9% 74.2% 52.7% 54.8% 44.8% 65.5% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 17/17 5.9 3.5 60.3% 70.5% 49.4% 60.5% 33.6% 62.2% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 20/20 4.8 2.5 68.9% 70.3% 50.2% 58.6% 43.1% 63.8% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 8/9 2.8 1.9 66.8% 67.4% 53.2% 60.2% 47.2% 63.3% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 421/425 5.8 2.8 60.8% 71.7% 52.3% 58.1% 41.6% 64.1% 36.6% — 93/94 15.5 5.0 60.2% 78.9% 51.1% 66.3% 34.2% 67.6% 28.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pablo Cuevas Sam Groth
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1557 104.1 +1.47 -1.35 1.219 53.0% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 2–0 — +0.15
21 2007 1551 110.8 +3.13 +0.76 0.628 39.7% — — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.20 2009 1548 110.5 -1.72 -0.48 0.708 45.0% — — — 33.3% -1.44 1–0 1–0 — +0.28
22 2008 1633 124.3 -1.73 -1.88 0.867 47.8% +1 -44 — 37.5% -0.81 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.48 2010 1527 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 1745 137.5 +0.89 -2.33 0.983 50.1% -71 +96 — 55.4% +0.08 6–6 (50%) 7–2 (78%) — +1.03 2011 1493 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2010 1761 136.7 -1.96 -0.08 0.937 48.6% -45 +38 — 48.9% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 15–2 (88%) — +0.76 2012 1479 100.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2011 1743 138.9 +2.31 +0.26 1.110 51.3% -28 +9 — 52.6% +0.12 2–7 (22%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.08 2013 1553 113.3 -1.09 +0.67 0.946 49.0% -20 — — 40.0% -0.60 0–2 2–0 — -0.22
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1708 131.6 +4.20 -3.96 0.998 49.9% -73 — +91 41.8% -0.15 3–4 (43%) 11–13 (46%) — +0.17
27 2013 1717 114.3 -1.40 -3.04 0.783 46.7% -23 — — 43.8% -1.13 1–1 1–1 — +0.05 2015 1797 142.6 +2.73 -5.23 0.895 48.7% -77 -215 +92 46.9% -0.37 6–8 (43%) 18–13 (58%) — -0.77
28 2014 1843 147.6 +0.35 +2.31 1.103 51.7% -117 +98 — 54.7% +0.27 7–6 (54%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.40 2016 1636 125.3 +0.82 -4.85 0.819 47.1% -67 — +169 24.4% -1.29 0–2 2–11 (15%) — -1.24
29 2015 1815 156.3 +0.03 +1.37 1.032 50.7% -98 +211 -198 50.7% +0.06 9–11 (45%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.40 2017 1594 116.2 -0.83 -1.85 0.767 47.3% -41 — — 35.7% -0.86 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
30 2016 1810 152.1 +3.77 +0.09 1.125 51.7% -111 +203 -133 57.5% +0.44 12–10 (55%) 19–20 (49%) — +2.40 2018 1572 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1788 154.1 +0.80 -0.10 0.998 49.9% -91 +130 — 47.6% -0.14 9–7 (56%) 9–12 (43%) — +1.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1767 142.3 +1.63 +0.47 1.090 51.2% -24 +67 — 47.0% +0.24 4–4 (50%) 6–14 (30%) — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1741 144.0 +1.27 -0.02 1.050 50.6% -34 +106 -89 49.1% +0.03 7–8 (47%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1692 131.9 -0.42 -0.37 0.941 48.8% -54 +121 — 42.6% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1652 127.3 +0.69 -1.10 0.984 49.6% -2 +108 — 45.1% -0.25 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1654 112.6 +0.30 -1.95 1.017 50.8% — +63 — 41.7% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1612 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1580 89.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1960 148.4 +0.77 -0.05 1.019 50.3% -70 +102 -143 49.9% -0.03 68–74 (48%) 100–95 (51%) 98.5 +1.59 — 1849 129.9 +2.18 -4.18 0.894 48.6% -69 -215 +113 40.3% -0.56 12–17 (41%) 37–39 (49%) 98.2 -2.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.