H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Pablo Cuevas vs Sergiy Stakhovsky
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Pablo Cuevas vs Sergiy Stakhovsky.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Pablo Cuevas | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |