H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Paolo Lorenzi vs Marcos Daniel H2H: 0-1

Marcos Daniel holds a 1–0 lead over Paolo Lorenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcos Daniel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcos Daniel won the 2010 Argentina Open first round 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Paolo Lorenzi
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Marcos Daniel
BRA Age 48 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marcos Daniel #86 6-1 6-3 Paolo Lorenzi #91 Match data Feb 18, 2010* R32 Argentina Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paolo Lorenzi #1,033 #33 1,223 1,823 105 181 36.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Marcos Daniel #904 #56 942 1,645 20 64 23.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paolo Lorenzi Marcos Daniel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #236 1,485 0 0
24 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,503 0 0 2003 1–3 25.0% #169 1,504 0 0
25 2007 1–1 50.0% #294 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — 2005 0–2 0.0% #94 1,520 0 0
27 2009 0–1 0.0% #84 1,437 0 0 2006 5–16 23.8% #165 1,445 0 0
28 2010 2–14 12.5% #143 1,435 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #118 1,517 0 0
29 2011 2–3 40.0% #108 1,516 0 0 2008 6–15 28.6% #87 1,509 0 0
30 2012 8–17 32.0% #64 1,604 0 0 2009 6–12 33.3% #87 1,602 0 0
31 2013 13–24 35.1% #109 1,646 0 0 2010 2–10 16.7% #96 1,498 0 0
32 2014 11–14 44.0% #64 1,663 0 0 2011 0–3 0.0% #904 1,484 0 0
33 2015 7–18 28.0% #68 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2016 24–25 49.0% #40 1,793 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2017 24–32 42.9% #43 1,700 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2018 6–15 28.6% #109 1,632 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2019 6–10 37.5% #115 1,628 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2020 1–4 20.0% #146 1,536 0 1 — — — — — — —
39 2021 0–2 0.0% #274 1,493 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paolo Lorenzi Marcos Daniel
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 0 5 5 0.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2010 0 6 6 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2007 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 0 5 5 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2009 1 5 6 16.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 0 3 3 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2015 3 7 10 30.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 10 12 22 45.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 9 17 26 34.6% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 3 4 7 42.9% 2 9 11 18.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 43 79 122 35.2% 57 81 138 41.3% 5 21 26 19.2% — 1 23 24 4.2% 18 35 53 34.0% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 283/286 of Paolo Lorenzi's and 83/84 of Marcos Daniel's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Paolo Lorenzi Marcos Daniel
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 1/1 2.0 1.0 49.3% 62.2% 52.6% 81.3% 100.0% 57.3% 29.1%
24 2006 1/1 0.0 1.0 53.3% 42.5% 48.6% 41.7% 37.5% 45.3% 40.0% 2003 4/4 3.3 3.0 64.4% 64.1% 42.5% 61.3% 58.8% 55.9% 34.7%
25 2007 2/2 0.5 3.0 66.3% 62.4% 44.0% 46.4% 60.0% 55.5% 27.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 2/2 2.0 4.0 59.2% 60.5% 53.6% 73.1% 31.3% 57.6% 27.0%
27 2009 1/1 2.0 2.0 54.3% 64.0% 28.6% 33.3% — 47.8% 17.9% 2006 21/21 3.8 1.6 65.0% 62.3% 45.2% 43.5% 49.4% 57.0% 34.8%
28 2010 16/16 4.1 4.3 61.0% 64.7% 44.6% 56.6% 27.2% 56.9% 33.2% 2007 2/2 1.5 2.0 59.0% 59.3% 35.3% 41.4% 0.0% 49.5% 29.6%
29 2011 5/5 1.8 2.8 65.2% 66.1% 42.6% 51.9% 38.0% 57.9% 36.6% 2008 20/21 4.6 1.7 60.8% 68.3% 48.5% 58.7% 29.8% 60.7% 32.9%
30 2012 25/25 2.6 2.0 61.5% 63.8% 48.2% 50.5% 34.3% 57.8% 34.1% 2009 18/18 5.4 2.9 59.6% 68.5% 50.4% 53.1% 45.6% 61.3% 30.7%
31 2013 37/37 2.9 2.3 57.2% 67.7% 49.8% 52.7% 36.3% 60.1% 36.2% 2010 12/12 5.3 2.3 59.2% 68.8% 40.5% 54.2% 48.6% 56.6% 32.0%
32 2014 25/25 3.8 2.1 57.6% 70.1% 48.9% 60.1% 48.5% 61.1% 39.9% 2011 3/3 0.0 1.0 63.2% 39.2% 22.9% 20.0% 25.0% 32.7% 29.7%
33 2015 25/25 4.2 2.6 56.5% 66.9% 49.3% 51.8% 40.9% 58.6% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 47/49 4.0 2.6 56.3% 69.0% 48.1% 55.5% 43.8% 60.0% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 55/56 4.5 2.8 58.5% 69.4% 52.7% 56.4% 38.4% 62.3% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 21/21 5.4 3.4 57.6% 71.0% 45.0% 61.9% 37.0% 59.9% 33.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 16/16 5.0 3.3 60.6% 71.1% 51.4% 67.4% 45.2% 63.4% 30.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 5/5 2.8 3.0 56.9% 67.8% 43.1% 48.1% 24.2% 57.0% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 2/2 2.5 2.5 61.3% 61.1% 32.2% 58.3% 50.0% 49.3% 25.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 283/286 3.9 2.7 58.3% 68.1% 48.8% 55.8% 39.3% 60.0% 34.8% — 83/84 4.3 2.1 61.4% 65.2% 45.5% 51.9% 42.3% 57.7% 32.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paolo Lorenzi Marcos Daniel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
22 2004 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 1469 94.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1485 92.6 -1.32 -3.35 0.682 45.4% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18
24 2006 1504 104.3 +3.27 -1.79 0.732 42.8% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — -0.08 2003 1505 109.2 -2.90 -0.82 0.787 46.9% — — — 36.4% -0.82 0–1 1–1 — -0.36
25 2007 1493 97.8 -0.64 -3.08 0.618 43.5% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 1–1 — -0.04 2004 1500 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2008 1459 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1521 115.5 +1.61 +4.56 0.637 44.2% — — — 0.0% -2.60 — 0–2 — -0.44
27 2009 1438 104.3 -4.82 +0.04 0.344 34.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 2006 1445 121.5 -3.69 -2.29 0.809 46.3% -8 +103 — 31.9% -1.11 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 -0.06
28 2010 1435 112.9 -3.79 -3.23 0.770 45.2% +6 +72 +28 20.0% -1.85 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 97.7 -0.07 2007 1518 113.4 -0.91 -2.00 0.586 38.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09
29 2011 1517 125.6 -0.71 +1.76 0.870 47.1% -1 — — 45.5% -1.00 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.31 2008 1510 113.6 -1.79 -3.23 0.835 47.0% -113 +95 — 31.9% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) 98.0 +0.25
30 2012 1604 133.1 -3.58 -1.74 0.808 45.7% -7 -40 -150 33.9% -1.24 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 101.5 -0.29 2009 1602 132.8 -1.64 -3.70 0.794 46.6% -199 +110 — 31.7% -1.20 1–1 4–1 (80%) — -0.60
31 2013 1647 139.6 -1.95 -1.10 0.906 48.1% -26 -59 -191 36.5% -0.84 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 -0.92 2010 1499 111.5 -3.07 -3.09 0.739 45.5% -106 +119 -65 26.7% -1.43 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 96.7 +0.32
32 2014 1664 133.8 -1.37 +1.94 1.025 50.4% -26 +44 -207 42.1% -0.40 2–6 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 +0.70 2011 1485 99.5 -5.19 -0.62 0.441 32.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.23
33 2015 1615 126.4 -3.80 -3.71 0.748 45.0% +9 +14 — 31.7% -0.88 5–2 (71%) 2–8 (20%) 98.7 +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1793 148.1 -2.03 -0.06 0.925 48.8% -53 -16 -398 46.8% -0.22 11–6 (65%) 10–11 (48%) 108.4 +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1701 139.0 -1.35 -1.16 0.925 48.8% -33 +63 -290 45.9% -0.32 8–11 (42%) 15–16 (48%) 96.7 +2.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1632 123.3 -2.86 -2.73 0.824 47.1% +52 -8 -190 35.7% -0.70 0–4 (0%) 5–7 (42%) 94.8 +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 1629 124.6 -0.47 -3.08 0.836 47.5% +77 -70 — 37.0% -0.67 5–3 (63%) 7–10 (41%) 101.2 +1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 1537 109.2 -1.98 -0.85 0.778 45.2% +108 — — 16.7% -1.67 1–0 0–1 — +0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1494 93.1 -2.75 -1.01 0.505 38.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1824 134.2 -2.16 -1.27 0.869 47.5% -9 +4 -201 38.6% -0.71 41–46 (47%) 51–71 (42%) 98.6 +2.10 — 1646 121.4 -2.49 -2.65 0.767 45.7% -111 +104 -65 29.1% -1.30 3–12 (20%) 11–11 (50%) 94.2 -1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.