H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Paolo Lorenzi vs Pere Riba H2H: 2-1
Paolo Lorenzi holds a 2–1 lead over Pere Riba in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Paolo Lorenzi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pere Riba won the 2014 Rome Masters second round 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2014* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Pere Riba | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Paolo Lorenzi | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2014* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Paolo Lorenzi | 7-5 6-3 | Pere Riba | Match data |
| Jun 9, 2010* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R64 | Grass | Paolo Lorenzi | 6-4 6-4 | Pere Riba | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paolo Lorenzi | #1,033 | #33 | 1,223 | 1,823 | 104 | 180 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pere Riba | #1,502 | #65 | 761 | 1,731 | 24 | 63 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paolo Lorenzi | Pere Riba | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #121 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #72 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #294 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #114 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #143 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #109 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2015 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |